On Saturday 11 June 2005 02:48, Karl Chen wrote:
> > On 2005-06-10 15:26 PDT, Blaisorblade writes:
>
> Blaisorblade> Ok, in this case there's probably a simpler
> Blaisorblade> road: simply use a 2.4.27-1bs kernel. The
> Blaisorblade> implemented behaviour is that all created files
> On 2005-06-10 15:26 PDT, Blaisorblade writes:
Blaisorblade> Ok, in this case there's probably a simpler
Blaisorblade> road: simply use a 2.4.27-1bs kernel. The
Blaisorblade> implemented behaviour is that all created files
Blaisorblade> will have the ID they have on the host,
On Friday 10 June 2005 22:14, Karl Chen wrote:
> > On 2005-06-10 09:03 PDT, Blaisorblade writes:
> >> Hostfs seems to make everything owned by root -- even files
> >> created by non-root users.
>
> Blaisorblade> So you are running uml as root?
>
> Blaisorblade> Or you are runni
> On 2005-06-10 09:03 PDT, Blaisorblade writes:
>> Hostfs seems to make everything owned by root -- even files
>> created by non-root users.
Blaisorblade> So you are running uml as root?
Blaisorblade> Or you are running UML as non-root but with
Blaisorblade> hostfs as root
On Friday 10 June 2005 07:34, Karl Chen wrote:
> Hi, I'm doing some large-scale security experiments on Debian
> security. I'm using UML to do the whole thing on a cluster.
> Hostfs seems to make everything owned by root -- even files
> created by non-root users.
So you are running uml as root?
Hi, I'm doing some large-scale security experiments on Debian
security. I'm using UML to do the whole thing on a cluster.
Hostfs seems to make everything owned by root -- even files
created by non-root users. I'm currently using 2.4.26-3 (Debian
package). I found a few posts via Google mention
