Re: [uml-devel] question about UML sigcontext in tt mode

2005-04-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:20, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2005 10:00 am, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:03:34PM +0800, Alex LIU wrote: > > > union uml_pt_regs { > > > #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_TT > > > struct tt_regs { > > > long syscall; > > > void *sc; > > > } tt

Re: [uml-devel] question about UML sigcontext in tt mode

2005-04-05 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 04 April 2005 10:00 am, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:03:34PM +0800, Alex LIU wrote: > > union uml_pt_regs { > > #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_TT > > struct tt_regs { > > long syscall; > > void *sc; > > } tt; > > #endif > > }; > > -

Re: [uml-devel] question about UML sigcontext in tt mode

2005-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:03:34PM +0800, Alex LIU wrote: > union uml_pt_regs { > #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_TT > struct tt_regs { > long syscall; > void *sc; > } tt; > #endif > }; > - > > Then why the tt.sc is defined as void

Re: [uml-devel] question about UML sigcontext in tt mode

2005-04-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 31 March 2005 12:03, Alex LIU wrote: > Hi,all: > > I have a question about the sigcontext in tt mode.The union uml_pt_regs is > defined as below(in uml-2.6.7): > > > union uml_pt_regs { > #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_TT > struct tt_regs { > long syscall; >

[uml-devel] question about UML sigcontext in tt mode

2005-03-31 Thread Alex LIU
Hi,all: I have a question about the sigcontext in tt mode.The union uml_pt_regs is defined as below(in uml-2.6.7): union uml_pt_regs { #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_TT struct tt_regs { long syscall; void *sc; } tt; #endif