Hi Michael,
I'm CC'ing uml-devel as the discussion is very relevant and could be
interesting for everybody.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 23:13, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> "Paolo" == Paolo Giarrusso writes:
> Any idea where to send patches/git-tree pull requests.
> 2.6.31 still works, 2.6.35 co
> There's none, but vanilla 2.6.10 has included UML support; I
> wouldn't call
> that trustworthy (especially from the "security" point of view).
>
> The amount of patches which went in for UML before 2.6.11 was
> released was so
> big, and they were so heavy, I never got around to releasing
On Monday 19 September 2005 22:08, Majid Salame wrote:
> Hi all,
> Could anyone point me to a stable linux-2.6.10 UML patch ?
There's none, but vanilla 2.6.10 has included UML support; I wouldn't call
that trustworthy (especially from the "security" point of view).
The amount of patches which we
Hi all,
Could anyone point me to a stable linux-2.6.10 UML patch ?
MS
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your
Title: UML patch for red hat entreprise 3.0
Does anyone have a patch for red hat enterprise 3.0?
Majid.
hi!
I have a question regarding applying a uml patch. Can i apply a uml
2.6.0-test9 patch to a linux 2.6.8.1-4 kernel? should the uml patch
version and kernel version be the same always??
Thanks,
Ashwin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Or
