Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Create asm-i386/cmpxchg.h

2007-05-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > My guess is ff means firstfloor :) > > https://www.x86-64.org/pipermail/discuss/2006-January/007467.html Thanks! That makes much more sense than my funky German keyboard theory... Jeff -- Work ema

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Create asm-i386/cmpxchg.h

2007-05-02 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 2 May 2007 11:38:47 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:37:48AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Doesn't apply against the latest ff tree. Can you please regenerate, > > not losing whatever change caused it to reject? > > What's the ff tree? Is 'f' next to

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Create asm-i386/cmpxchg.h

2007-05-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:37:48AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Doesn't apply against the latest ff tree. Can you please regenerate, > not losing whatever change caused it to reject? What's the ff tree? Is 'f' next to 'm' on your keyboard? It depends on the tas() elimination patch, which I sent to

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Create asm-i386/cmpxchg.h

2007-05-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 20:21:57 Jeff Dike wrote: > Rearrange the i386 cmpxchg code to allow atomic.h to get it without > needing to include system.h. This kills warnings in the UML build > from atomic.h about implicit declarations of cmpxchg symbols. The > i386 build presumably isn't seeing this