On 08/22/2013 01:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> >> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>> >> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH !=
>> SUBARC
On 08/22/2013 03:55:20 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 01:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>>> >> > These architectu
On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg
> wrote:
> >> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
> >> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH !=
> SUBARCH.
> >> > Do really need that behavior?
> >
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH != SUBARCH.
>> > Do really need that behavior?
>>
>> This does remove functionality.
>> It allows to build a kernel usi
>
> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH != SUBARCH.
> > Do really need that behavior?
>
> This does remove functionality.
> It allows to build a kernel using e.g. "make ARCH=m68k".
>
> Perhaps this can be moved
On 08/21/2013 07:07:33 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Weinberger
> wrote:
> > This series is an attempt to remove the SUBARCH make parameter.
> > It as introduced at the times of Linux 2.5 for UML to tell the UML
> > build system what the real architect
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
> These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH != SUBARCH.
> Do really need that behavior?
Not precisely that, but it’s very common in m68k land
to just cross-build kernels with
Am 21.08.2013 14:07, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> This series is an attempt to remove the SUBARCH make parameter.
>> It as introduced at the times of Linux 2.5 for UML to tell the UML
>> build system what the real architecture is.
>>
If ARCH doesn't match uname for some definition of match?
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>> The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>> These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH !=
>SUBARCH.
>> Do really need that behavior
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This series is an attempt to remove the SUBARCH make parameter.
> It as introduced at the times of Linux 2.5 for UML to tell the UML
> build system what the real architecture is.
>
> But we actually don't need SUBARCH, we can store this
10 matches
Mail list logo
