On Monday 23 January 2006 20:59, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >>Blaisorblade wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >>>I.e. extend ptrace to trap lcall gates, right? That's another thing
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably ge
On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >>Blaisorblade wrote:
> >>>On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it
could be used for more than just UML?
Not yet, thoughts welcome.
On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >>Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it
> >>could be used for more than just UML?
> >
> >Not yet, thoughts welcome.
>
> Let's se
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it
could be used for more than just UML?
Not yet, thoughts welcome.
Let's see:
to support HURD (which uses the Mach ABI):
-- existing faciliti
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it
> could be used for more than just UML?
Not yet, thoughts welcome.
> PS: If I understand correctly, UML with the current SKAS3 works by
> swapping processes into and out