Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-30 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 23 January 2006 20:59, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > >On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >>Blaisorblade wrote: > >>>On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >>>I.e. extend ptrace to trap lcall gates, right? That's another thing

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-23 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Blaisorblade wrote: On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Blaisorblade wrote: On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Blaisorblade wrote: On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably ge

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > >On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >>Blaisorblade wrote: > >>>On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-19 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Blaisorblade wrote: On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Blaisorblade wrote: On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it could be used for more than just UML? Not yet, thoughts welcome.

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-18 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 19 January 2006 00:52, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > >On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >>Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it > >>could be used for more than just UML? > > > >Not yet, thoughts welcome. > > Let's se

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-18 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Blaisorblade wrote: On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it could be used for more than just UML? Not yet, thoughts welcome. Let's see: to support HURD (which uses the Mach ABI): -- existing faciliti

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS4 design question

2006-01-18 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:34, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Has any thought been given to making SKAS4 suitably generic that it > could be used for more than just UML? Not yet, thoughts welcome. > PS: If I understand correctly, UML with the current SKAS3 works by > swapping processes into and out