Re: [uml-devel] missing asm/user.h

2007-03-26 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 10:52 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:36:28PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > Update: isn't there either, but includes > > user_regs_struct, so that's sufficient for this problem. > > Hummph, I hope that's true of every other distro that people use

Re: [uml-devel] missing asm/user.h

2007-03-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:36:28PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > Update: isn't there either, but includes > user_regs_struct, so that's sufficient for this problem. Hummph, I hope that's true of every other distro that people use UML on. > The next problem is lack of . Most files failing

Re: [uml-devel] missing asm/user.h

2007-03-24 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 21:27 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:33:56PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > In their infinite wisdom, the Gentoo kernel team has decided to not ship > > asm/user.h with the kernel headers package anymore. Since UML (even, as > > far as I can tell, i

Re: [uml-devel] missing asm/user.h

2007-03-24 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 21:27 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:33:56PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > In their infinite wisdom, the Gentoo kernel team has decided to not ship > > asm/user.h with the kernel headers package anymore. Since UML (even, as > > far as I can tell, i

Re: [uml-devel] missing asm/user.h

2007-03-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:33:56PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > In their infinite wisdom, the Gentoo kernel team has decided to not ship > asm/user.h with the kernel headers package anymore. Since UML (even, as > far as I can tell, in the most recent versions) uses this in several > places, i