On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:51:32PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Also, what is the difference between your "stack trace" patch, which adds a
> member to thread_struct, for each process, so I'd like a minimum of
> justification, and one of the sysrq options which does exactly this?
What this does,
Void casting: my compiler gave me a warning, and I don't like that.
pid=-1, leftover from error checking that i didn't need, my fault.
pid=0, find_task_by_pid(0) will return a valid pointer, but it doesn't
seem to really be a good task. This seems to be related to the kernel
idle task. If you
On Friday 02 September 2005 18:59, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:06:33PM -0400, Allan Graves wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > Here's the patches. Hope these meet your approval!
Could you please write a proper changelog? Reading a patch is possible, but
needs time which I don't have in the ver
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:06:33PM -0400, Allan Graves wrote:
> Jeff,
> Here's the patches. Hope these meet your approval!
> Allan
Some comments - I have these all fixed:
+struct task_struct *from=(struct task_struct*)prev;
+struct task_struct *to=(struct task_str
