[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If you think it cannot make sense to include both and
> (as userspace process, i.e. host includes), go
> complaining with glibc, or follow the linux-abi includes idea.
> However, the compilation failure is possibly glibc-version (or better
> glibc includes version) rela
Is it my imagination, or did you put the definition of can_do_skas under
#ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_SKAS and failed to do the same for the call?
Jeff
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blue
I played with nesting quite a bit when the -bb1 and -bb2 kernels were
the latest available, trying to set up a network simulation for
educational/testing purposes. Although the nested kernels (with
properly configured CONFIG_NEST_LEVEL) booted properly and appeared
to work well, it ran into tr
On Friday 14 January 2005 20:24, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Is it my imagination, or did you put the definition of can_do_skas under
> #ifdef UML_CONFIG_MODE_SKAS and failed to do the same for the call?
Look at the end:
#else
+int can_do_skas(void)
+{
return(0);
-#endif
}
+#endif
This dummy ca
On Thursday 13 January 2005 06:12, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Well, effectively your reasoning holds, apart for one point: the code
> should not hang because of that large INITIAL_JIFFIES. What we care about
> are only the value of jiffies relative to INITIAL_JIFFIES, indeed.
>
> In fact, that code work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Look at the end:
Oops, missed that. Sorry.
Jeff
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun
