[uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/7] UML - set_tsk_need_resched

2005-05-30 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > This is the UML resched patch. Please stick it in with the other arch resched > fixes. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c > === > --- linux-2.6.11.orig/arch/

RE: [uml-devel] Kernel panic with 2.6.11.6

2005-05-30 Thread Anthony Brock
Never mind. The issue is still present. The instance, while lasting longer, crashed once I reconnect to the "screen" via a "screen -r my-uml-instance" command on day 4. Was the previous information enough, or should I generate another backtrace? Also, this seems to be prevalent when the host (SKAS

[uml-devel] Slower system call with SMP

2005-05-30 Thread Majid Salame
Title: Slower system call with SMP The cost of a system call it seems to be higher when Running a RHE host with dual CPU (SMP turned on) and the image is patched with skas patch. Doe that make sense ? Doing the same test by disabling SMP on the host, and results are much faster. NOTE SMP is

Re: [uml-devel] Slower system call with SMP

2005-05-30 Thread stian
> Doe that make sense ? Doing the same test by disabling SMP on the host, > and > results are much faster. > NOTE SMP is turned off for the UML. This is a shot from the hip, but UML uses multiple processes for it's buisness. When host is SMP, these can be mapped to different cpu's, and when inter

RE: [uml-devel] Slower system call with SMP

2005-05-30 Thread Majid Salame
Title: RE: [uml-devel] Slower system call with SMP > UML uses multiple processes for it's buisness. With Skas UML is just one process as it appears on the Host, or do you mean something else. >When host is > SMP, these can be mapped to different cpu's, and when > interprocess stuff is t