[uml-devel] [patch 4/4] SYSEMU: fix sysaudit / singlestep interaction

2005-07-27 Thread blaisorblade
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This is simply an adjustment for "Ptrace - i386: fix Syscall Audit interaction with singlestep" to work on top of SYSEMU patches, too. On this patch, I have some do

[uml-devel] [patch 1/4] UML Support - Ptrace: adds the host SYSEMU support, for UML and general usage

2005-07-27 Thread blaisorblade
From: Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adds a new ptrace(2) mode, called PTRACE_SYSEMU, resembling PTRACE_SYSCALL except that the kernel does not execute the requested syscall;

[uml-devel] [patch 3/4] Uml support: add PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP option to i386

2005-07-27 Thread blaisorblade
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch implements the new ptrace option PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP, which can be used by UML to singlestep a process: it will receive SINGLESTEP interceptions for normal instructions and syscalls, but syscall execution will be skipped just like with PTRA

[uml-devel] [patch 2/4] Uml support: reorganize PTRACE_SYSEMU support

2005-07-27 Thread blaisorblade
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> With this patch, we change the way we handle switching from PTRACE_SYSEMU to PTRACE_{SINGLESTEP,SYSCALL}, to free TIF_SYSCALL_EMU from double use as a preparation for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP extension, without changing the behavior of the host kernel. Si

Re: [uml-devel] Slower system call with SMP

2005-07-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 30 May 2005 20:58, Majid Salame wrote: > > UML uses multiple processes for it's buisness. > With Skas UML is just one process as it appears on the Host, or do you mean > something else. No, it's at least two (+ possible service threads): one is the thread executing kernel code, which pt

Re: [uml-devel] NEW compile errors for UMLPPC

2005-07-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 25 July 2005 20:28, ashwin tanugula wrote: > Hi, > I think those errors came due to the inclusion of > include/asm/processor-i386.h. I remover that inclusion and included > the structure arch_thread in processor-generic.h, which removed the > previous errors. > > Now I am getting the foll

[uml-devel] Venda a 7.000.000 de consumidores sale a 7.0000 customers

2005-07-27 Thread Sell everything Venda todo
Contact 7,000,000+ e-mail addresses to expose your product to the retail sector!http://www.hireoffices.com/Ingles/servi-integrales/Espanol/crea-nece.asp Contacte con + de 7.000.000 de consumidores y muestrele su productohttp://www.hireoffices.com/servi-integrales/Espanol/crea-nece.asp remove -