Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/12] UML - Allow host capability usage to be disabled

2005-09-02 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 02 September 2005 00:17, Jeff Dike wrote: > From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Add new cmdline setups: > - noprocmm > - noptracefaultinfo > In case of testing, they can be used to switch off usage of > /proc/mm and PTRACE_FAULTINFO independently. Is "skas0" cmd line option p

[uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/12] UML - tty fix

2005-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 18:16 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > This fixes a build breakage introduced by Alan's tty cleanups. This should > be tied to that patch if possible. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: linux-2.6.13-mm1/arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c > ===

Re: [uml-devel] stack and scheduler patches

2005-09-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:06:33PM -0400, Allan Graves wrote: > Jeff, > Here's the patches. Hope these meet your approval! > Allan Some comments - I have these all fixed: +struct task_struct *from=(struct task_struct*)prev; +struct task_struct *to=(struct task_str

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/12] UML - Allow host capability usage to be disabled

2005-09-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:39:23PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Is "skas0" cmd line option preserved? Yes, it is. Jeff --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005

[uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/18] remap_file_pages protection support (for UML), try 3

2005-09-02 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Blaisorblade wrote: > > * The first 2 patches modify the PTE encoding macros and start preparing the > VM for the new situation (i.e. VMA which have variable protections, which are > called VM_NONUNIFORM. I dropped the early VM_MANYPROTS name). What a pity: please revert.

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables

2005-09-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch. + WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte)); This one has been firing on me, and I decided to figure out why. The culprit is this code in do_no_

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables

2005-09-02 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch. > > + WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte)); > > This one has been firing on me, and I decided to fi