I'm not understanding why glibc would break the registers at will.
From setjmp:
/* NOTE: The machine-dependent definitions of `__sigsetjmp'
assume that a `jmp_buf' begins with a `__jmp_buf' and that
`__mask_was_saved' follows it. Do not move these members
or add others before
On Monday 03 October 2005 15:40, Allan Graves wrote:
> I'm not understanding why glibc would break the registers at will.
> From setjmp:
> /* NOTE: The machine-dependent definitions of `__sigsetjmp'
>assume that a `jmp_buf' begins with a `__jmp_buf' and that
>`__mask_was_saved'
On Monday 03 October 2005 08:02, Nelson Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I'm sending a patch that allows me to query the
> number of keys pressed by the user (I'll copy [4]).
> --
> # cat /proc/keystrokes
> 29
> --
> I read [1] and skimmed over [2] and I think I'm using
> the __init
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:31, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Sorry, any reference will fault, unless it is done on a allocated present
> > page, which the UML kernel freed but the host didn't. And remember, btw,
> > you've planned to make thi
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:37, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 October 2005 17:51, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Al, is that ok for you if we follow this original plan?
> >
> > In this case, I'll post the dropping patch and re-send the Kbuil
On Sunday 02 October 2005 22:54, Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, speaking of Kbuild cleanups (and that one is definitely 2.6.15
> fodder): patch below
> * kills messing with lib vs. core for uml-amd64 (we don't need that
> anymore)
I'm even curious why we needed that in first place.
> * kills sy
On 10/3/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You have a trivial typo.
Yup :( Thanks.
--
Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself
and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman.
--
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:35:54PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> /dev/anon - when the UML kernel frees a page, we ask the host to free it too.
Yeah, /dev/anon is a completely different story, but I thought we were talking
about normal tmpfs.
Jeff
-
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> The second is that, even if x86_64 uses things such as (from
> arch/x86_64/mm/Makefile):
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
> hugetlbpage-y = ../../i386/mm/hugetlbpage.o
> (because hugetlbpage.o is conditional)
>
> we