Hi all,
I am trying to integrate 2.6.x support to debian and I encountered a
blocking issue on networking configuration.
If you use the 2.4.x uml kernel the UML image work fine with network, but
if you use an available 2.6.x uml image or a 2.6.x image of mine the uml
bootstrap phase hangs with the
On Friday 17 February 2006 12:51, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to integrate 2.6.x support to debian and I encountered a
> blocking issue on networking configuration.
> If you use the 2.4.x uml kernel the UML image work fine with network, but
> if you use an available 2.6.x uml im
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 01:07:50PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Hi Paolo,
> > If you use the 2.4.x uml kernel the UML image work fine with network, but
> > if you use an available 2.6.x uml image or a 2.6.x image of mine the uml
> > bootstrap phase hangs with the following error message:
>
> Indeed
On Friday 17 February 2006 14:47, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 01:07:50PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > > If you use the 2.4.x uml kernel the UML image work fine with network,
> > > but if you use an available 2.6.x uml image or a 2.6.x image of mine
> > > the um
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Ciao Paolo,
> > yes, first I tried my own configuration, then I downloaded a prebuild uml
> > kernel from http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ and I tried with this one. Same
> > error again.
> > Then I extracted the configuration from that image a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> For the future packaging: I do believe that Debian's defaults have been
> actually planned while uml_utilities haven't, so I like the idea of switching
> to Debian paths as defaults, and possibly using the current ones as
> fallback
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:19:07AM -0500, William Stearns wrote:
> The uml patch tar file at
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.16-rc2/patches.tar
>
> should apply to 2.6.16-rc2, but when I try to apply it I get:
I just tried that -
made a rc2 tree
Good afternoon, Jeff,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:19:07AM -0500, William Stearns wrote:
The uml patch tar file at
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.16-rc2/patches.tar
should apply to 2.6.16-rc2, but when I try to apply it I
On Friday 17 February 2006 16:44, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > For the future packaging: I do believe that Debian's defaults have been
> > actually planned while uml_utilities haven't, so I like the idea of
> > switching to Debian paths as def
On Friday 17 February 2006 15:29, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ciao Paolo,
>
> > # ls -l /usr/bin/uml_net
> > -rws--x--x 1 root root 22856 16 feb 18:49 /usr/bin/uml_net
>
> damn, it drived me crazy!!!
Yep, we found the thing by accident
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:29:58PM -0500, William Stearns wrote:
> >I submit to you that perhaps your tree is not quite the cleanest
> >2.6.15-rc2 :-)
>
> Ummm, 2.6._16_-rc2, I expect you meant.
Correct, but that was still a true statement :-)
> I opened up the linux-2.6.16-rc2.tar.b
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device 1
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device 2
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device 3
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device 4
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device 5
> > parse_chan_pair failed for device
On Friday 17 February 2006 3:29 pm, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > parse_chan_pair failed for device 1
> > > parse_chan_pair failed for device 2
> > > parse_chan_pair failed for device 3
> > > parse_chan_pair failed for device 4
> > > parse_cha
13 matches
Mail list logo
