> Ok, this gives us a definite proposal, which I finally like:
>
> * to exclude sys_tee:
>
> bitmask = 0;
> set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> ptrace(PTRACE_SET_NOTRACE, bitmask);
>
> * to trace only sys_tee:
>
> bitmask = 0;
> set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> ptrace(PTRACE_SET_TRACEONLY, bitmask);
>
On Saturday 29 April 2006 01:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > These patches are 2.6.17 material.
>
> "remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle" isn't.
Being restrictive is ok, but keeping patches in queues for longer than needed
creates more headaches than it
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Unless one considers
> > UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)
>
> Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple
> times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of
> a
Hello Jeff, Paolo,
Sorry for the long mail, I hope it's not too boring ;)
I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
Firts of all: are a
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:45PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
> user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
> the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
> Firts of all: are all t
