Re: [uml-devel] Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c00000, ip 0x80bcead

2006-10-13 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host. > > Kernel file is here: > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25 > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c0, ip > 0x8

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 01/14] uml: fix compilation options for USER_OBJS

2006-10-13 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote: > Ok, at a first glance this alternative solution is ok. Make sure (run > gdb on an userspace object file and saying list ) that it > works and we'll be ok. After discovering that the original patch broke UML/i386 and broke the UML/x

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 06/14] uml: make UML_SETJMP always safe

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 09 October 2006 20:00, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:38:52PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote: > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If enable is moved by GCC in a register its value may not be preserved > > after coming back ther

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS mode not working, x86_64 SMP host, x86_64 guest, problems with noprocmm

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 08 October 2006 22:01, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > That's it! > -mm3 kernel is causing this problem, and Your patch indeed fixes it! I > completely forgot that I was also trying mm patches and I certainly > mixed them with Your patches :-/ > at least I'm glad that I now know where the problem

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c00000, ip 0x80bcead

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > > This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host. > > > > Kernel file is here: > > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25 > > > > > > Kernel panic

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c00000, ip 0x80bcead

2006-10-13 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote: >>> This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host. >>> >>> Kernel file is here: >>> http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/kernels/2.6.18-linode25 >

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] proc filesystem ipaddress

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 13 October 2006 05:33, Nic James Ferrier wrote: > I know this is not UML specific... but maybe the kernel hackers here > can answer this anyway, since I'm doing it to make life with UMLs > easier. > > I've patched the ipv4 stack so that it does proc registration of the > IP address for an

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] proc filesystem ipaddress

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 14 October 2006 03:46, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 13 October 2006 05:33, Nic James Ferrier wrote: > > I know this is not UML specific... but maybe the kernel hackers here > > can answer this anyway, since I'm doing it to make life with UMLs > > easier. > > > > I've patched the ipv4

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c00000, ip 0x80bcead

2006-10-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 14 October 2006 03:19, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 13 October 2006 22:07, Jeff Dike wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:17:06PM -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >>> This is 2.6.18-um, on top of a 2.6.16.29-skas3-v8.2 host. > >>> > >>> Kernel file

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel mode fault at addr 0x92c00000, ip 0x80bcead

2006-10-13 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Blaisorblade wrote: > Which is the cmd line? With how much memory where these instances started? Kernel command line: mem=300M fake_ide fakehd con=null con0=fd:0,fd:1 devfs=nomount root=/dev/ubda ubda= 7 ubdb= eth0=tuntap,encode1_0,fe:fd:46:55:81:95 token_max=40 token_refill=512 > Ok, Jeff,