On Saturday 10 February 2007 18:27, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote:
> Fix the fact that pte_mkread set _PAGE_RW instead of _PAGE_USER (the logic
> is copied from i386 in most place, so it is really as bad as you're
> thinking).
>
> Thus currently page tables are more permissive than they shou
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:34:42PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Jeff, no answer to this yet? I've just checked and it's not on the patchset
> page either.
I already had it in my -mm patchset, minus any attribution, so I guess
I cooked it up myself. I've been running with it for a long time, so i
On Thursday 15 February 2007 05:42, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2007 04:36, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 26 January 2007 16:13, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 04:07:05AM -0500, William Stearns wrote:
> > > > After bisecting the difference between the t
On Monday 19 February 2007 20:52, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:34:42PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Jeff, no answer to this yet? I've just checked and it's not on the
> > patchset page either.
> I already had it in my -mm patchset, minus any attribution, so I guess
> I cooked it
On Friday 16 February 2007 19:40, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:02:08PM -0500, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > I agree - I have only a vague idea about what uml_reserved means.
>
> This is ancient code - after a quick look through it, I think what is
> happening is this:
> Early in boot
