[uml-devel] Building a UML uClinux(Busybox/uClibc) filesystem

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Sinclair
Hello all, I've been able to use the pre-built Busybox 1.5.0 filesystem at http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ perfectly with the same UML kernel I am using. Unfortunately, when trying to generate my own filesystem, my kernel no longer works. It basically stops after mounting the filesystem. When I try

Re: [uml-devel] Building a UML uClinux(Busybox/uClibc) filesystem

2007-06-07 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Andrew Sinclair wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been able to use the pre-built Busybox 1.5.0 filesystem at > http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ perfectly with the same UML kernel I am using. > > > Unfortunately, when trying to generate my own filesystem, my k

Re: [uml-devel] Building a UML uClinux(Busybox/uClibc) filesystem

2007-06-07 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:57:19PM +1000, Andrew Sinclair wrote: > Unfortunately, when trying to generate my own filesystem, my kernel no > longer works. It basically stops after mounting the filesystem. > > When I try and use gdb to debug I get stuck in > arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h:50 > > sta

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] Hang on FC6 after mounting root filesystem

2007-06-07 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:34:35AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > I figured out what was happening. FC6 has a broken PTRACE_SYSEMU, > resulting in system call interception being completely broken, and > init going into an infinite segfault loop. > > The patch below is a workaround, and fixes it for me

Re: [uml-devel] doubt regarding UML instlation please help me.

2007-06-07 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:13:10AM -0500, battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > this is the log that i foundlikewise this gets executed > repetedlly... OK, so it does loop. > make: Warning: File `/root/Desktop/linux-2.6.21/arch/um/Makefile-os-Linux' > has modification time 2e+0

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value

2007-06-07 Thread Zach Brown
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:19:23PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > cachemiss_thread should explicitly return 0 or error instead of > task_ret_reg(current) (which is -ENOSYS anyway) because > async_thread_helper is careful to put the return value in eax anyway. Here's the fix I came up with for this. Un