Christoph Hellwig wrote at 22:18:37
> I really can't see any relation to the patch. Can you try the some
> things in the following order, please:
...
> (4) re-apply the include/linux/statfs.h changes and see if it still
> boots
The first half of step 4 was it (I did not apply the "Definit
2010/10/18 Toralf Förster :
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote at 22:18:37
>> I really can't see any relation to the patch. Can you try the some
>> things in the following order, please:
> ...
>> (4) re-apply the include/linux/statfs.h changes and see if it still
>> boots
>
> The first half of ste
Well, in addition to my last mail the following patch isn't a fix, but it
might point to the culprit.
If I apply this patch against latest tree, then the crash doesn't occur :
diff --git a/include/linux/statfs.h b/include/linux/statfs.h
index 0166d32..e336e70 100644
--- a/include/linux/statfs.h
+
2010/10/18 Toralf Förster :
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote at 22:18:37
>> I really can't see any relation to the patch. Can you try the some
>> things in the following order, please:
> ...
>> (4) re-apply the include/linux/statfs.h changes and see if it still
>> boots
>
> The first half of ste
2010/10/18 Toralf Förster :
> Well, in addition to my last mail the following patch isn't a fix, but it
> might point to the culprit.
> If I apply this patch against latest tree, then the crash doesn't occur :
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/statfs.h b/include/linux/statfs.h
> index 0166d32..e336e70
2010/10/18 Geert Uytterhoeven :
> 2010/10/18 Toralf Förster :
>> Well, in addition to my last mail the following patch isn't a fix, but it
>> might point to the culprit.
>> If I apply this patch against latest tree, then the crash doesn't occur :
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/statfs.h b/include/
2010/10/18 Toralf Förster :
> Well, in addition to my last mail the following patch isn't a fix, but it
> might point to the culprit.
> If I apply this patch against latest tree, then the crash doesn't occur :
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/statfs.h b/include/linux/statfs.h
> index 0166d32..e336e70
richard -rw- weinberger wrote at 11:31:31
> Does this help?
>
> --- linux-2.6.36-rc8/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c.orig 2010-10-18
> 11:24:33.844592000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc8/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c2010-10-18
> 11:24:44.594679000 +0200
> @@ -388,6 +388,6 @@
> spare_out[1] = buf.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:14:26 +0200, Toralf Förster
wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger wrote at 11:31:31
>> Does this help?
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.36-rc8/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c.orig 2010-10-18
>> 11:24:33.844592000 +0200
>> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc8/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c2010-10-18
>> 11:24:44.59
365b1818 resized f_spare within struct statfs.
hostfs accesses f_spare directly and needs an update.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
Reported-by: Toralf Förster
Tested-by: Toralf Förster
---
fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> 365b1818 resized f_spare within struct statfs.
> hostfs accesses f_spare directly and needs an update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> Reported-by: Toralf F__rster
> Tested-by: Toralf F__rster
> ---
> fs/hostfs/hostfs_use
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 20:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> 365b1818 resized f_spare within struct statfs.
>> hostfs accesses f_spare directly and needs an update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
>> Reported-by: Toralf F__rster
>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 21:31, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Montag 18 Oktober 2010, 21:22:31 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 20:40, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger
> wrote:
>> >> 365b1818 resized f_spare within struct sta
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:53:58 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Montag 18 Oktober 2010, 20:40:39 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger
> wrote:
> > > 365b1818 resized f_spare within struct statfs.
> > > hostfs accesses f_spare directly and needs an u
Hi,
On the following page:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html
There is a link to a patch by Johan Verrept that adds some USB support
to UML:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/patches/uml-hcd-2.4.3.patch
Unfortunately, this is from 2001, and is for
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:02:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any reason for hostfs to be playing with the f_spare field at
> > > all?
No, there is no reason at all. do_statfs is only called by
hostfs_statfs, which is the hostfs implementation of ->statfs. zeroing
of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
