On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:20 -0800, Jason Lunz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:39:41AM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > >
> > > Allow parts of drivers/mtd to compile on uml by pushing the HAS_IOMEM
> > > dependencies down closer to
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:24:38PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> But I think your solution is a bit dirty, because it adds a great deal
> of little 'if HAS_IOMEM' and '#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM' to many places.
> This is error-prone.
The intent of that patch was to allow as much of the mtd subsy
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:51 -0800, Jason Lunz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:24:38PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > But I think your solution is a bit dirty, because it adds a great deal
> > of little 'if HAS_IOMEM' and '#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM' to many places.
> > This is error-prone.
>
On one hand you've got uml, which simply doesn't have mmio. On the other
there's mtd, which began as a method for accessing hardware devices that
are often accessed using mmio. But then the mtd subsystem developed
emulations of that hardware that are software based and thus don't
require mmio. It'
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 21:01, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:51 -0800, Jason Lunz wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:24:38PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> > But I think your solution is a bit dirty, because it adds a great deal
>> > of little 'if HAS_IOMEM' and '#ifdef C
From: Randy Dunlap
Add missing MODULE_LICENSE():
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in arch/um/drivers/mmapper_kern.o
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Greg Lonnon
---
arch/um/drivers/mmapper_kern.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- linux-next-20101214.orig/arch/um/drivers
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 14:01:33 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > Instead, you should solve this problem in UML code. I do not know how,
> > > but may be you can add readb/writeb there which actually do nothing or
> > > print a scary warning, or do BUG(), and let things which use them just
> > > f
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:49:02PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> The problem is that jffs2 is a filesystem, and thus something people would
> really like to be able to loopback mount, but it's hardwired to assume it's
> only ever stored on a certain type of hardware, and thus requies incestuous
>
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 15:23:49 Jason Lunz wrote:
> On one hand you've got uml, which simply doesn't have mmio. On the other
> there's mtd, which began as a method for accessing hardware devices that
> are often accessed using mmio. But then the mtd subsystem developed
> emulations of that har
