On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:33 AM, David Fernández wrote:
>
> El 19/06/2012, a las 11:03, richard -rw- weinberger escribió:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Fernández wrote:
>>> Any idea of the cause of the problem? A simple 'diff' between 3.3 and
>>> 3.4 versions shows the option pars
On 20/06/12 09:17, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:33 AM, David Fernández wrote:
>> El 19/06/2012, a las 11:03, richard -rw- weinberger escribió:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Fernández wrote:
Any idea of the cause of the problem? A simple 'diff'
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:02 PM, David Fernández wrote:
> Finally I managed to do the git bisect with your indications. The result:
>
> # git bisect bad
> 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d is the first bad commit
> commit 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d
> Author: Pawel Moll
> Date
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Martin Pärtel wrote:
> UML guest processes now get correct siginfo_t for SIGTRAP, SIGFPE,
> SIGILL and SIGBUS. Specifically, si_addr and si_code are now correct
> where previously they were si_addr = NULL and si_code = 128.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Pärtel
Do we
