Glibc provides __ptr_t for the pointer in the stack_t struct,
but other C libraries - namely musl - do not necessarily do so.
In that case, fall back to a void* pointer.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Werner Hilse
---
arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch
Naming local variables "stdin" and "stdout" is fine with glibc,
other C libraries, namely musl, will however complain.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Werner Hilse
---
arch/um/drivers/harddog_user.c | 18 +-
arch/um/drivers/net_user.c | 6 +++---
arch/um/drivers/slip_
Hi,
Am 2015-06-10 23:20, schrieb Hans-Werner Hilse:
[...]
This three-part patch series will allow to compile UML against the musl
libc implementation - even statically.
Take it as a suggestion, but I think most things are quite sensible. The
__ptr_t stuff is admittedly a bit ugly.
-hwh
-
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Glibc provides __ptr_t for the pointer in the stack_t struct,
> but other C libraries - namely musl - do not necessarily do so.
> In that case, fall back to a void* pointer.
Please just kill __ptr_t in UML.
--
Thanks,
//richard
-
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Naming local variables "stdin" and "stdout" is fine with glibc,
> other C libraries, namely musl, will however complain.
Wait, what?!
These are not local variables, they are struct members.
What exactly is the issue with musl? Sounds v
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> The functions in question are not part of the POSIX standard,
> documentation however hints that the corresponding header shall
> be sys/types.h. C libraries other than glibc, namely musl, did
> not include that header via other ways and
Hi,
Am 2015-06-10 23:37, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hans-Werner Hilse
> wrote:
>> Naming local variables "stdin" and "stdout" is fine with glibc,
>> other C libraries, namely musl, will however complain.
>
> Wait, what?!
> These are not local variables, they
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2015-06-10 23:37, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hans-Werner Hilse
>> wrote:
>>> Naming local variables "stdin" and "stdout" is fine with glibc,
>>> other C libraries, namely musl, will howeve
