Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Migrate vector timers to new timer API

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Montag, 5. März 2018, 11:41:42 CEST schrieb anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com: > From: Anton Ivanov > > The patches for the UML vector drivers were in-flight when > the timer changes happened and were not covered by them. > > This change migrates vector_kern.c to use the new timer API. > > Sig

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] Fix vector raw inintialization logic

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Montag, 5. März 2018, 14:29:05 CEST schrieb anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com: > From: Anton Ivanov > > Vector RAW in UML needs to BPF filter its own MAC only > if QDISC_BYPASS has failed. If QDISC_BYPASS is successful, the > frames originated locally are not visible to readers on the > raw sock

Re: [uml-devel] UML hangs with hrtimer test module

2018-03-29 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 00:19:39 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes: >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> > Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:

Re: [uml-devel] UML hangs with hrtimer test module

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 22:20:47 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes: > Thanks a lot! I am wondering why the same compiler works when running > the test for a regular image. Maybe different compiler flags. Anyway > good to learn this. > > Also one more slightly OT question, why is UML only doing UP

Re: [uml-devel] [0/9] UML vector network driver: Adjustments for three function implementations

2018-03-29 Thread Anton Ivanov
Yes, Next version though, I have some tweaks enqueued for the socket initialization. We can combine them with these. On 29 March 2018 20:51:55 BST, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:06:16 +0100 >> >> Some update suggestions were taken into account >> from static source co

[uml-devel] [PATCH] um: Fix return value of start_idle_thread

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
While the function will never returns, gcc will warns. Add a return statement to make gcc happy. Before f44f1e7da7c8 we never noticed because gcc knows that longjmp does not return. arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c: In function ‘start_idle_thread’: arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:613:1: warning: co