Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK

2006-05-01 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
g to read extra bits out of the bitmask that userspace didn't initialize! Also, if you store the mask with the child process, it risks surprising existing tracers: attach, set mask, detach, then the next time someone attaches an old version of strace some syscalls will be "hidden".

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK

2006-05-01 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
read the thread this morning - sorry. I'll watch for the next posting. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technolog