Hi!
> This is the UML resched patch. Please stick it in with the other arch resched
> fixes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.11.orig/arch/
Hi!
> This patch moves code that is in both switch_to_tt and
> switch_to_skas to the top level _switch_to function, keeping us from
> duplicating code. It is required for the stack trace patch to work
> properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allan Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EM
Hi!
> Add PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK, which allows system calls to be selectively
> traced. It takes a bitmask and a length. A system call is traced
> if its bit is one. Otherwise, it executes normally, and is
> invisible to the ptracing parent.
>
> This is not just useful for UML - strace -e could m
On Mon 2014-10-06 22:28:05, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Poweroff handlers may now be installed with register_poweroff_handler.
> Use the new API function have_kernel_poweroff to determine if a poweroff
> handler has been installed.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: Pavel Mache
Hi!
> @@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void)
> void
> machine_power_off(void)
> {
> + do_kernel_poweroff();
> +
poweroff -> power_off for consistency.
> index c4f50a3..1da27d1 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ void ma
Hi!
> +/**
> + * register_poweroff_handler_simple - Register function to be called to
> power off
> + * the system
> + * @handler: Function to be called to power off the system
> + * @priority: Handler priority. For priority guidelines see
> +
Hi!
> >>@@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void)
> >> void
> >> machine_power_off(void)
> >> {
> >>+ do_kernel_poweroff();
> >>+
> >
> >poweroff -> power_off for consistency.
> >
> Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately went
> with poweroff to distinguish powe
