[uml-devel] v3.3-6972-ge22057c core dumped

2012-03-26 Thread Toralf Förster
are_namespace () at init/do_mounts.c:555 #12 0x0804992b in kernel_init (unused=0x0) at init/main.c:829 #13 0x0807189e in run_kernel_thread (fn=0x8049816 , arg=0x0, jmp_ptr=0xa464440) at arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:257 #14 0x0805ecf5 in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:154 #15

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/2] um: Disintegrate asm/system.h

2012-03-30 Thread Toralf Förster
Richard Weinberger wrote at 19:18:49 > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > Reported-by: Toralf Förster > CC: [email protected] > --- works fine. Now the situation is the same as before :/ : ... LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-lin

[uml-devel] 3 cc warnings while compiling an UML kernel

2012-04-01 Thread Toralf Förster
/keys/keyctl.c:1520:2: warning: #warning TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME not implemented fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c: In function ‘encode_exchange_id.clone.78’: fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:1718:1: warning: the frame size of 1036 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes I attached the use .config, hope this helps. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf

[uml-devel] UML 3-4-rc1 /(rarely) core dumps

2012-04-01 Thread Toralf Förster
e wonders whether it is usefull or not. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here

[uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80()

2013-05-11 Thread Toralf Förster
-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80() Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:20:05 +0200 From: richard -rw- weinberger To: Toralf Förster CC: [email protected] , [email protected] On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > The bisec

Re: [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80()

2013-05-11 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/11/2013 10:47 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> >> Dave, >> >> can you pls answer to Richards question: >> >> So, we trigger "if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > KMALLOC_MAX_

Re: [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80()

2013-05-11 Thread Toralf Förster
gth: 70 2013-05-11T15:16:02.850+02:00 trinity kernel: strndup_user_debug: strnlen_user() returned: -14 2013-05-11T15:16:02.850+02:00 trinity kernel: strndup_user_debug: calling memdup_user() with length: -14 -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508

Re: [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80()

2013-05-11 Thread Toralf Förster
11T15:42:35.000+02:00 trinity haveged: haveged: Completed continuous procedure B after 1171996 bytes 2013-05-11T15:42:35.000+02:00 trinity dhcpcd[770]: version 5.6.4 starting -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 ---

Re: [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] WARNING: at mm/slab_common.c:376 kmalloc_slab+0x33/0x80()

2013-05-11 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/11/2013 03:37 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > Found the real problem, UML's strnlen_user() is broken. > Please test the attached patch. yeah, that works now :-) -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E50

[uml-devel] trinity triggers often "WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x164/0x170()"

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
9>ҩ <88><88> <88>̈ҿ̈ҿ̈ҿT̫̺̳o̬̜ ì̬͎̲̟nv̖̗̻̣̹̕o͖̗̠̜̤k͍͚̹͖̼e̦̗̪͍̪͍ ̬ͅt̕h̠͙̮͕͓e̱̜̗͙̭ ̥͔̫͙̪͍̣͝ḥi̼̦͈̼v̩̟͚̞͎e͈̟̻͙̦̤-m̷̘̝̱í͚̞̦̳n̝̲̯̙̮͞d̴̺̦͕̫ ̗̭̘͎͖r̞͎̜̜͖͎̫͢ep͇r̝̯̝͖͉͎̺e̴s̥e̵̖̳͉͍̩̗n̢͓̪͕̜̰̠̦t̺̞̰i͟n̮̦̖̟g̮͍̱̻͍̜̳ ̳c̖

[uml-devel] oom-killer forced by syscall add_key

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
ernel: Killed process 1018 (trinity-child0) total-vm:1161448kB, anon-rss:445060kB, file-rss:1716kB -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- Learn Graph Da

[uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
With recent host and guest kernel trinity often triggers that warning which refers to this line WARN_ON(mm->nr_ptes > (FIRST_USER_ADDRESS+PMD_SIZE-1)>>PMD_SHIFT); /me wonders if (and how) I can help to identify the root cause (if it is not already known). -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/12/2013 05:58 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > Do you have stub_pte_fix.diff applied? yes, both the stub and the strnlen patch -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/12/2013 06:31 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > Toralf, can you please replace stub_pte_fix.diff with the attached patch? yep - works much better - no WARNING:/BUG: so far (tested 3.10-rc1 + strnlen + stub2 patch) -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
20:40:47.757+02:00 trinity kernel: 2013-05-12T20:40:47.757+02:00 trinity kernel: ---[ end trace 610449969e20fc68 ]--- 2013-05-12T20:40:47.758+02:00 trinity kernel: XXX mm->nr_ptes: 4294967295 2013-05-12T20:40:50.000+02:00 trinity sshd[2350]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user tfoerste

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/12/2013 09:45 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > Damn, we've underrun the counter. :-\ > Can you please test the attached 3rd debug patch? yes - but give me a chance and attach a patch ;) -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E50

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/12/2013 09:56 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 05/12/2013 09:45 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> Damn, we've underrun the counter. :-\ >>> Can you please test the attached 3rd deb

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-12 Thread Toralf Förster
0:01:36.013+02:00 trinity kernel: 9 - 0 2013-05-13T00:01:36.013+02:00 trinity kernel: 10 - 33 2013-05-13T00:01:36.013+02:00 trinity kernel: 11 - 2013-05-13T00:01:36.013+02:00 trinity kernel: 12 - 1000c3 2013-05-13T00:01:36.013+02:00 trinity kernel: 13 - 73 2013-05-13T

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-13 Thread Toralf Förster
l: 40257e60: [<080ecf53>] SyS_mremap+0x263/0x480 2013-05-13T19:20:42.392+02:00 trinity kernel: 40257eac: [<08062ac2>] handle_syscall+0x82/0xb0 2013-05-13T19:20:42.392+02:00 trinity kernel: 40257ef4: [<0807519d>] userspace+0x46d/0x590 2013-05-13T19:20:42.392+02:00 trinity kerne

[uml-devel] trinity fuzzying gave : BUG anon_vma (Not tainted): Redzone overwritten

2013-05-14 Thread Toralf Förster
T18:06:22.658+02:00 trinity kernel: 41837ffc: [<>] 0x0 2013-05-14T18:06:22.658+02:00 trinity kernel: 2013-05-14T18:06:22.658+02:00 trinity kernel: FIX anon_vma: Restoring 0x405084f8-0x405084fb=0xbb 2013-05

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-15 Thread Toralf Förster
inity kernel: 16 - 7b 2013-05-15T21:02:04.065+02:00 trinity kernel: wait_stub_done : failed to wait for SIGTRAP, pid = 15692, n = 15692, errno = 0, status = 0xb7f and now that process can't be killed - I had to stop the UML guest. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 0

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-15 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/15/2013 09:11 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 05/13/2013 09:12 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> This looks like another issue. >>> Are you testing process_vm_writev() with trinity

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: at mm/mmap.c:2757 exit_mmap+0x161/0x170()

2013-05-17 Thread Toralf Förster
10 0x30 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibilit

[uml-devel] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, rngd/1062

2013-05-30 Thread Toralf Förster
andler+0x65/0x80 2013-05-30T12:26:56.969+02:00 trinity kernel: 085b7840: [<080709e8>] sig_handler_common+0xb8/0xe0 2013-05-30T12:26:56.969+02:00 trinity kernel: 085b7ac4: [<08070b2d>] sig_handler+0x3d/0x50 2013-05-30T12:26:56.969+02:00 trinity kernel: 085b7ad4: [<0807067b>]

[uml-devel] BUG kmalloc-256 (Not tainted): Poison overwritten

2013-07-13 Thread Toralf Förster
02:00 trinity kernel: FIX kmalloc-256: Marking all objects used 2013-07-13T20:25:50.000+02:00 trinity dhcpcd[970]: eth0: sending IPv6 Router Solicitation 2013-07-13T20:25:52.000+02:00 trinity cron[1113]: (CRON) STARTUP (V5.0) 2 -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC8

[uml-devel] sunrpc/clnt.c: BUG kmalloc-256 (Not tainted): Poison overwritten

2013-07-14 Thread Toralf Förster
= 2013-07-13T22:09:16.648+02:00 trinity kernel: BUG kmalloc-256 (Tainted: GB ): Poison overwritten 2013-07-13T22:09:16.648+02:00 trinity kernel:

Re: [uml-devel] sunrpc/clnt.c: BUG kmalloc-256 (Not tainted): Poison overwritten

2013-07-15 Thread Toralf Förster
On 07/15/2013 05:01 AM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 10:02 +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> This bisected commit produces at a 32 bit user mode linux guest the attached >> BUG : >> >> commit 245268c951262b861bc1be4e9dc812352499 >> Author: Tr

[uml-devel] fuzzying a user mode linux image often core dumps with

2013-07-20 Thread Toralf Förster
, pid=) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:198 #19 userspace (regs=0x46e0c7d4) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:431 #20 0x0805e65c in fork_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:160 #21 0x in ?? () -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A

Re: [uml-devel] fuzzying a user mode linux image often core dumps with

2013-07-21 Thread Toralf Förster
On 07/21/2013 03:03 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 05:07:19PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> I do run the fuzzer trinity within a 32 bit user mode linux. >> With latest git tree I do often get a core dump like the one attached. >> >> Althoug

[uml-devel] Fwd: fuzz tested user mode linux core dumps in fs/lockd/clntproc.c:131

2013-07-27 Thread Toralf Förster
forogt to Cc: UML ml Original Message Subject: fuzz tested user mode linux core dumps in fs/lockd/clntproc.c:131 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:03:20 +0200 From: Toralf Förster To: Andrey Vagin , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrey Vagin , Al Viro CC: Linux N

[uml-devel] Fwd: Re: fuzz tested user mode linux core dumps in fs/lockd/clntproc.c:131

2013-07-28 Thread Toralf Förster
: Toralf Förster ,Andrey Vagin CC: Serge E. Hallyn ,Eric W. Biederman ,Al Viro , Linux NFS mailing list On 07/28, Toralf Förster wrote: > > The attached patch works - applied on top of current git - > at least the issue cannot be reproduced then. Thanks Toralf. I

[uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-11 Thread Toralf Förster
k); exit_files(tsk); exit_fs(tsk); - exit_task_namespaces(tsk); exit_task_work(tsk); + exit_task_namespaces(tsk); check_stack_usage(); exit_thread(); -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-14 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/13/2013 11:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: >>> so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at >>> least its reboot functional

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-28 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote: >>>> so that the server either crashes (if it is

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-08-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >>> On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 201

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-01 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:57:45AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 P

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/01/2013 11:15 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 01.09.2013 18:09, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 08/30/2013 04:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 30.08.2013 16:10, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>>> On 08/29/2013 03:30 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>>

[uml-devel] reported size of a hostfs file system differs

2013-09-03 Thread Toralf Förster
tfoerste users 20 Sep 3 19:11 n22unst4 -rw-r--r-- 1 tfoerste users 20 Sep 3 19:53 trinity -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- Learn the latest

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-07 Thread Toralf Förster
On 08/28/2013 07:21 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >>>> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster w

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-10 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm >> issues) and got 2 times a core dump >> when I fuzzy test an UML machine wi

[uml-devel] winch_thread : TIOCSCTTY failed on fd 1 err = 1

2013-09-11 Thread Toralf Förster
k(tsk); + exit_task_namespaces(tsk); check_stack_usage(); exit_thread(); (got from Oleg Nesterov) -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -

[uml-devel] difference of a shell script versus command line WRT "winch_thread : TIOCSCTTY failed on fd 1 err = 1"

2013-09-16 Thread Toralf Förster
Now I'm wondering what makes the difference and what's the correct way to start an UML. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- LIMITED TIME S

Re: [uml-devel] difference of a shell script versus command line WRT "winch_thread : TIOCSCTTY failed on fd 1 err = 1"

2013-09-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/22/2013 08:52 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> If I run the following script >> >> $> cat l.sh >> #!/bin/sh >> # >> >> /usr/local/bin/linux-v3.11-8718-g0fb5ca1 earlyprint

Re: [uml-devel] difference of a shell script versus command line WRT "winch_thread : TIOCSCTTY failed on fd 1 err = 1"

2013-09-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/22/2013 10:27 AM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 09/22/2013 08:52 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >>> If I run the following script >>> >>> $> cat l.sh >>> #!/bin/sh

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-09-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm >> issues) and got 2 times a core dump >> when I fuzzy test an UML machine wi

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86_64

2013-09-27 Thread Toralf Förster
eat plan is to destroy Linux. I work for Microsoft. ;-) > > Seriously, my plan is to get rid of SUBARCH, that's why I did not push your > patches > upstream and I've send the rid of SUBARCH patch series.

[uml-devel] fuzz tested UML cores in pshrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree (dentry=0x47bd7840) at fs/dcache.c:928

2013-09-29 Thread Toralf Förster
cible. Therefore although bisected 2 times in a row there's a chance that this commit is rather the upper limit instead of the 1st bad commit -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508

[uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-02 Thread Toralf Förster
1 (Not a directory) [2031] [131] mkdir(pathname="/proc/1092/task/1092/fdinfo/316", mode=525) = -1 (File exists) [2031] [132] fsetxattr(fd=386, name=0x856f158, value=0x8571160, size=0, flags=0) = -1 (Numerical result out of range) [2031] [133] io_setup(nr_events=4095, ctxp=0x40266000) ^CKille

[uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-02 Thread Toralf Förster
[2031] [130] fchdir(fd=397) = -1 (Not a directory) [2031] [131] mkdir(pathname="/proc/1092/task/1092/fdinfo/316", mode=525) = -1 (File exists) [2031] [132] fsetxattr(fd=386, name=0x856f158, value=0x8571160, size=0, flags=0) = -1 (Numerical result out of range) [2031] [133] io_setup(nr_e

Re: [uml-devel] Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server

2013-10-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 09/23/2013 07:41 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:58:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 09/10/2013 04:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >>>> Today I run latest git tree

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-03 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/02/2013 09:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: >> Running trinity (1 process, no victim files, just "$>trinity -C1) for a >> longer time >> within a 32 bit user mode linux image with a recent git kernel (host

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-03 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/03/2013 09:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 03.10.2013 20:54, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 10/02/2013 09:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> Running trinity (1 process, no v

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-03 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/03/2013 09:20 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 03.10.2013 21:16, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 10/03/2013 09:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 03.10.2013 20:54, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>>> On 10/02/2013 09:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>&g

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-06 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/04/2013 07:52 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 03.10.2013 21:33, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 10/03/2013 09:20 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 03.10.2013 21:16, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>>> On 10/03/2013 09:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-06 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/06/2013 08:38 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: >> The UML stopped here : >> ... >> if (unlikely(task_ratelimit == 0)) { >> period = max_pause; >>

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-06 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/06/2013 10:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 10/06/2013 08:38 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> The UML stopped here :

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-08 Thread Toralf Förster
s is just hanging ?) and BUG_ON doesn't gave me any new clues. On 10/06/2013 10:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 10/06/2013 08:38 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Toralf För

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-09 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/08/2013 10:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >>> Hmm, now pages_dirtied is zero, according to the backtrace, but the BUG_ON() >>> asserts its strict positive?!? >>> >>> Can you plea

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-10 Thread Toralf Förster
> Thx, get_maintainer.pl didn't list him. > >>> Am 09.10.2013 19:26, schrieb Toralf Förster: >>>> On 10/08/2013 10:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Toralf Förster >>>>> wrote: >>>>&

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-11 Thread Toralf Förster
ick: pages_dirtied : 14 ick: task_ratelimit: 0 On 10/11/2013 03:16 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 06:49:30PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 12:33 AM, Richard W

Re: [uml-devel] BUG: soft lockup for a user mode linux image

2013-10-11 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/11/2013 10:57 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:42:19AM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> yeah, now the picture becomes more clear >> ... >> net.core.warnings = 0 >>

[uml-devel] fuzz tested UML guest issue ccuring in fs/hostfs + mm/truncate

2013-10-20 Thread Toralf Förster
rch/um/kernel/process.c:160 #25 0x in ?? () B/c of fs/hostfs I assume this might be an UML specific thing, but I'm unsure how to narrow doesn this now... -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7

[uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs at in histfs

2013-10-22 Thread Toralf Förster
watchdog] [1516] Watchdog exiting I'm unsure if this is only UML specific, interesting for the fs people or mm or ... ? -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs at in histfs

2013-10-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/22/2013 06:12 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> >> When I fuzz testing a 32 bit UML at a 32 bit host (guest 3.12.-rc6-x, host >> 3.11.6) with trinity >> and use hostfs for the victom files for tri

[uml-devel] RFC: Shouldn't "./linux --version" always print the the git commit id

2013-10-25 Thread Toralf Förster
Just realized today the fact, that v3.11 reports just the tag and not "tag-g" I'm wondering about the reason to use "git describe" in favor of "git describe --long" ? -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82

Re: [uml-devel] RFC: Shouldn't "./linux --version" always print the the git commit id

2013-10-25 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/25/2013 10:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Toralf, > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> Just realized today the fact, that v3.11 reports just the tag and not >> "tag-g" > > You don't have CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_A

Re: [uml-devel] RFC: Shouldn't "./linux --version" always print the the git commit id

2013-10-26 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/26/2013 09:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 10/25/2013 10:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> Just realized today

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs at in hostfs

2013-10-29 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/22/2013 07:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 22.10.2013 18:23, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 10/22/2013 06:12 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> When I fuzz testi

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-10-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/22/2013 07:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 22.10.2013 18:23, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 10/22/2013 06:12 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> When I fuzz testi

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-11-06 Thread Toralf Förster
_inode_pages (mapping=0x28, lstart=77309411368) at mm/truncate.c:358 #5 0x0825e388 in hostfs_evict_inode (inode=0x462ad3b8) at fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:242 #6 0x0811a8df in evict (inode=0x462ad3b8) at fs/inode.c:549 -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 893

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-11-09 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/06/2013 10:31 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 06.11.2013 22:18, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 11/06/2013 05:06 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >>> In this case it must stop after scanning whole tree in line: >>> /* Overflow after ~0UL */ >>> if (!i

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-11-10 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/06/2013 10:31 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 06.11.2013 22:18, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 11/06/2013 05:06 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >>> In this case it must stop after scanning whole tree in line: >>> /* Overflow after ~0UL */ >>> if (!i

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-11-17 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/06/2013 10:31 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 06.11.2013 22:18, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 11/06/2013 05:06 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >>> In this case it must stop after scanning whole tree in line: >>> /* Overflow after ~0UL */ >>> if (!i

[uml-devel] fuzzed UML hangs at another place

2013-11-22 Thread Toralf Förster
- the process has already terminated ptrace: Operation not permitted. /home/tfoerste/8077: No such file or directory. No stack. ... A ssh into the UML is now no longer possible and no syslog messages any longer, I do just kill it therefore. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A

Re: [uml-devel] fuzz tested 32 bit user mode linux image hangs in radix_tree_next_chunk()

2013-11-22 Thread Toralf Förster
id=) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:198 #27 userspace (regs=0x48a787cc) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:431 #28 0x0805f770 in fork_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:149 #29 0x in ?? () -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6

[uml-devel] why does index in truncate_inode_pages_range() grows so much ?

2013-11-24 Thread Toralf Förster
95 I'm wondering if index is expected to become sometimes so big. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Sof

[uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
kernel/signal.c:3559 #5 0x080646d8 in winch_thread (arg=0x46d9eecc) at arch/um/drivers/chan_user.c:210 #6 0x083da38e in clone () -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 --

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/30/2013 03:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > > Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out. > > I do usually use "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts" to start a 32bit UML but because > the xterm way was fine during the past few weeks (yes, I know, it w

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> On 11/30/2013 03:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: >>> >>> Today I realized that a UML cores if I use the xterm for the in/out. >>> >>> I do

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 11/30/2013 03:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Please more details. >>> Does Linus' tree work? >>> Does it crash immediately?

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
On 11/30/2013 06:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 18:26:45 schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 11/30/2013 05:36 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am Samstag, 30. November 2013, 17:28:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: >>>> On 11/30/2013 03:5

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-11-30 Thread Toralf Förster
trinity cron[1257]: (root) CMD (test -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr/sbin/run-crons) after another minute now all xterms are away -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 ---

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-01 Thread Toralf Förster
> after a crash. > Maybe there are some error message before... Without xterm I do not see any errors except the "winch_thread ..." - line. BTW wrt the radix-tree-issue seems that fedora has now a similar bug open : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015028 -- MfG/Sinc

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-01 Thread Toralf Förster
On 12/01/2013 11:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 11:17:31 schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 12/01/2013 12:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>>> after another minute now all xterms are away >>> >>> So, it does not cra

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-01 Thread Toralf Förster
erste/devel/linux/linux -n -batch -ex 'bt full' > /mnt/ramdisk/$I.bt; sleep 10; done -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking syscall emulation patch for p

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 12/02/2013 10:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 20:05:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 12/01/2013 11:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> I meant xterm for all consoles but con0... >>> Such that you can trigger the crash but are s

Re: [uml-devel] why does index in truncate_inode_pages_range() grows so much ?

2013-12-07 Thread Toralf Förster
0:59 trinity kernel: type=1006 audit(1386435658.554:2): pid=1069 uid=0 old auid=4294967295 new auid=0 old ses=4294967295 new ses=1 res=1 Dec 7 18:00:59 trinity kernel: Virtual console 12 assigned device '/dev/pts/5' Dec 7 18:01:00 trinity dhcpcd[1094]: version 5.6.4 starting De

Re: [uml-devel] why does index in truncate_inode_pages_range() grows so much ?

2013-12-13 Thread Toralf Förster
reads with append dio > writes' (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg70899.html) > should actually change the situation and we won't unnecessarily > cache these pages. > confirmed - applied to latest git tree of Linus I helps. - -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print:1

Re: [uml-devel] why does index in truncate_inode_pages_range() grows so much ?

2013-12-13 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/13/2013 11:51 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Toralf Förster > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 12/11/2013 09:26 PM, Jan Kara wrote: >

[uml-devel] negative pid -516 possible ?

2013-12-21 Thread Toralf Förster
start_kernel_proc (unused=0x0) at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:46 pid = -516 #9 0x0805f7cb in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:129 fn = 0x0 #10 0x in ?? () No symbol table info available. Is this a valid number ? - -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp fi

Re: [uml-devel] negative pid -516 possible ?

2013-12-29 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/21/2013 03:36 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > Trinity'ing a 32 bit linux user mode linux (still the raid x tree issue ) > gives for a guest : > > tfoerste@n22 ~ $ date; sudo gdb /home/tfoerste/devel/linux/linux 10044 -n

Re: [uml-devel] negative pid -516 possible ?

2014-01-11 Thread Toralf Förster
igio_thread (unused=0x0) at arch/um/os-Linux/sigio.c:61 #4 0x083db56e in clone () warning: process 25234 is a zombie - the process has already terminated ptrace: Operation not permitted. /home/tfoerste/25234: No such file or directory. No stack. ... Please Cc: me I'm not subscribed. - -- MfG/S

Re: [uml-devel] negative pid -516 possible ?

2014-01-13 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/13/2014 12:21 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Toralf Förster > wrote: > I do fuzz testing with trinity (latest git version) a stable 32 bit Gentoo > Linux user mode linux image. > The host

Re: [uml-devel] negative pid -516 possible ?

2014-02-15 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/13/2014 08:54 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 01/13/2014 12:21 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Toralf Förster >> wrote: >> I do fuzz testing with trinity (latest git version) a stable 32

[uml-devel] where is pid 16666

2014-02-19 Thread Toralf Förster
= 18 timer = {it_interval = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}, it_value = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 1}} err = 17 status = 34175 op = 145877032 pid = 1 <-- local_using_sysemu = 2 si = #16 0x0805f770 in fork_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:149 No

[uml-devel] [info] syscall mremap can't be tested at a UML w/ fuzzy tool trinity

2014-03-01 Thread Toralf Förster
handle_syscall (r=0x477df0c8) at arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c:35 #22 0x08074905 in handle_trap (local_using_sysemu=, regs=, pid=) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:198 #23 userspace (regs=0x477df0c8) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:431 #24 0x0805f770 in fork_handler () at arch/um/kernel/proc

[uml-devel] trinity commit 23dc478aba breaks syscall "mremap" at a 32 bit user mode linux

2014-04-30 Thread Toralf Förster
-or- it uncovers a bug in kernel v3.15-rc3 for UML: commit 23dc478aba4134db51584d19e4783ec87ce87b88 Author: Dave Jones Date: Tue Apr 29 16:42:45 2014 -0400 non-biarch arches aren't necessarily 32-bit. diff --git a/children/random-syscalls.c b/children/random-syscalls.c index 82e49f5..1d

Re: [uml-devel] trinity commit 23dc478aba breaks syscall "mremap" at a 32 bit user mode linux

2014-05-01 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/01/2014 02:33 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 01.05.2014 12:29, schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 05/01/2014 11:22 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Toralf Förster >>> wrote: >>>> -or- it uncovers a bug in kernel v3.15-

Re: [uml-devel] trinity commit 23dc478aba breaks syscall "mremap" at a 32 bit user mode linux

2014-05-01 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/01/2014 10:57 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Toralf, > > Yeah, this is because trinity destroys the UML stub code. > Please test the attached patch, it should fix the root cause of the problem. > > Thanks, > //richard > If I do just apply fix2.patch onto latest git tree v3.15-rc3-113-gb

  1   2   >