Hi Paolo, thanks for your reply!
If you build with simply ARCH=um, you'll build a x86_64 UML binary.
And currently, there's 0 support to 32-bit binaries inside 64-bit hosts.
This
is why it's failing for you.
Ah ha!
But the solution is easy: clean your kernel tree and start over, adding to
I have learned that the newest linux kernel supported by the usb (hdc-uml)
patch is the 2.4.19. Aparently since that version the usb
API/framework/thing/model inside the kernel have changed in a way that the
patch was driven ineffective.
I didn try it with newer kernels yet.
Maybe tomorrow
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:23, Andy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Trying to get UML up and running (vanilla 2.6.13.4 kernel) although I keep
> getting the above error when booting. Full log is at the end of this post.
>
> Currently trying to boot into Gentoo's stage3 filesystem (created from
> stage3-x86-
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:45, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > I don't now if this also works in UML, but we use rdtsc for quite
> > something similar.
> > rdtsc is a C function which read a processor register (twice 32 bit)
> > which counts processor ticks (meaning on a 1 GHz processor you get a
> >
On Monday 24 October 2005 12:08, Antonio Mancina wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've got some problems setting-up uml to work on my system.
> I compiled a 2.6.12 vanilla kernel with ARCH=um option always on,
> downloaded the Debian 3.0 filesystem, renamed it in root_fs and
> runned
> #./linux
> with no more c
On Monday 24 October 2005 23:05, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
> > Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on
> > fedo=
> > ra weren't helping.
>
> I don't know about randomize_va_space, but exec-shield has never caus
> I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
> Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on
> fedo=
> ra weren't helping.
I don't know about randomize_va_space, but exec-shield has never caused
me any problems running uml in skas3 or skas0
> With exec-shiel
I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on fedora
weren't helping.
With exec-shield and randomize_va_space ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ./linux ubd0=cow1,root_rh9.ext3
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host..
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > Also, HZ (i.e. the timer interrupt) is implemented using signals (i.e.
> > alarm()), which are both slow and not precise (no more than host
> > jiffies).
> hm.. this suggests that maybe it would be really better not to use
> jiffies in UML (in my
> I don't now if this also works in UML, but we use rdtsc for quite something
> similar.
>
> rdtsc is a C function which read a processor register (twice 32 bit) which
> counts processor ticks (meaning on a 1 GHz processor you get a resolution of
> nano seconds).
well, I suppose UML is the keywor
Hi All,
Trying to get UML up and running (vanilla 2.6.13.4 kernel) although I keep
getting the above error when booting. Full log is at the end of this post.
Currently trying to boot into Gentoo's stage3 filesystem (created from
stage3-x86-2005.1.tar.bz2)but I've tried several root_fs's downl
>
> On Friday 21 October 2005 13:47, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > How can I increase the resolution of UML kernel timer?
> Elaborate on what you mean. You show being a kernel hacker, and I need to
> know
> if you want to increase the resolution for jiffies (i.e. you must surely
> increase HZ in UM
Hi all,
I've got some problems setting-up uml to work on my system.
I compiled a 2.6.12 vanilla kernel with ARCH=um option always on,
downloaded the Debian 3.0 filesystem, renamed it in root_fs and
runned
#./linux
with no more command-line options.
This is what I get as output (... is my home, obv
13 matches
Mail list logo
