On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:25:20PM +0200, J wrote:
> UML does not manage to start up and exits with the error:
> Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_ptrace
> : expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP | 0x80), got status = 256
> System:
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.25.3-18.fc
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:09:24AM +0100, David Chanters wrote:
> With a root_fs image i've made, everything works and it will spawn
> three xterms just fine - one for syslog, and another two with gettys
> attached. This is on my home system with a guest UML version 2.6.25.4
> and a host kernel wi
Hi -
2008/5/29 J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> UML does not manage to start up and exits with the error:
>Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_ptrace
> : expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP | 0x80), got status = 256
>
> I performed as said the following commands:
>
> $ wget -q http:/
UML does not manage to start up and exits with the error:
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_ptrace
: expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP | 0x80), got status = 256
I performed as said the following commands:
$ wget -q http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/FedoraCore5/FedoraCore5-x86-roo
Hi all,
I've been (ab)using UML now for a few days and have it all working
properly, except a small oddity...
With a root_fs image i've made, everything works and it will spawn
three xterms just fine - one for syslog, and another two with gettys
attached. This is on my home system with a guest U
