Hi,
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 02:12, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> > Sorry if this is an old topic, I'm a potential new UML user and I
> > don't see it mentioned on the web page.
> >
> > Should I expect a 2.4 based UML to run properly when hosted
> by a 2.6
> > host system? Is this a common co
Hi,
>
> > > Since I need to keep the SuSE kernel for the host system
> for various
> > > reasons, would it solve the problem, if I include the commandline
> > > syemu patch in the guest kernel and start it with
> nosysemu parameter?
> > I'm almost sure an updated SuSE kernel would solve this.
> Going by memory, this was because earlier SYSEMU patches were
> buggy. Recent UML refuse to run on earlier buggy SKAS patch
> revision. Older ones seemed to run well, but crashed due to
> the SYSEMU bug, for instance, when you did echo 0 >
> /proc/sysemu, and strace didn't work well, and so
ESI: EDI: EBP: DS: ES:
Call Trace: [] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[]
[] [] [] [] []
[]
[] [] [] [] []
[]
[] [] [] [] []
[]
[] [] [] []
-------
Gerald Richterec
