Thanks, but it was something wrong in my UML Kernel. Dont know what, I
just copied a .config from a known working copy and recompiled...
- derek
Nix wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2006, eTecc Support spake thusly:
>
>> Wow; I feel silly. Enabling UBD support in the UML Kernel. But now I
;> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of eTecc Support
>> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:00 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [uml-user] init= Issue
>>
>> Hello Again:
>>
>>
+0x3b/0x45
a092bc64: [] init+0x0/0x159
a092bc70: [] run_kernel_thread+0x24/0x45
a092bcd4: [] schedule_tail+0x24/0x161
a092bcf4: [] init+0x0/0x159
a092bcfc: [] new_thread_handler+0x9e/0xc9
a092bd00: [] init+0x0/0x159
a092bd5c: [] kill+0x11/0x20
--
eTecc Support
eTecc Communications, Inc
found. Try passing init= option to
kernel.
--
Derek Meiresonne
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:47:27PM -0600, eTecc Support wrote:
>> Systems were fine, until I recently rebooted. Now they will not start
>> declaring: "VFS: Cannot open root device "ub
ead_handler+0x9e/0xd0
a035fd00: [] init+0x0/0x160
a035fd5c: [] kill+0x11/0x20
--
eTecc Support
eTecc Communications, Inc.
www.eTecc.net
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay