On 26/03/2015 15:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Laurent Dufour wrote:
>
>>> I argue we should use the right condition to clear vdso_base: if
>>> the vDSO gets at least partially unmapped. Otherwise there's
>>> little point in the whole patch: either correctly track whether
>>> the vDSO is OK, o
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:43 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > > > > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > > +
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> > > + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> > > +{
> > > +
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> > + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > +* mr
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Laurent Dufour wrote:
>
> > +static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > + if (start <= mm->context.vd
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> > > + unsigned long new_
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > > > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long
> >
On 26/03/2015 10:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
+static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
+unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
+unsigned long new_st
* Laurent Dufour wrote:
> > I argue we should use the right condition to clear vdso_base: if
> > the vDSO gets at least partially unmapped. Otherwise there's
> > little point in the whole patch: either correctly track whether
> > the vDSO is OK, or don't ...
>
> That's a good option, but it
* Laurent Dufour wrote:
> +static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + if (start <= mm->context.vdso_base && mm->context.vdso_base < end)
> + mm->c
On 26/03/2015 10:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned
Some processes (CRIU) are moving the vDSO area using the mremap system
call. As a consequence the kernel reference to the vDSO base address is
no more valid and the signal return frame built once the vDSO has been
moved is not pointing to the new sigreturn address.
This patch handles vDSO remappin
12 matches
Mail list logo
