Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-22 Thread kewlemer
Hi Rodrigo, On 4/13/07, Rodrigo Baroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: > > I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of > > weeks now on and off. > > I've described the steps made to get a fully uml

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-19 Thread Joel Kreager
I tried compiling a 2.6.20 plain vanilla kernel for my host machine, and running the command suggested by R. L. Nevot iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 \ -j MASQUERADE This let me get out of my host machine. Who knows, maybe I forgot to remove the iptables --policy

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-16 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: > I tried running > iptables --flush > iptables -t nat --flush > > early on. iptables -L and iptables -t nat -n -L show no rules. As far > as I know, I have no other sort of firewall on my linux box. OK, I guess that rules out a fir

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-14 Thread R.L. Nevot
so now, with no rules in your iptables, try: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQUERADE and restart your UML On 4/14/07, Joel Kreager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: >> I have be

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-13 Thread Joel Kreager
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: >> I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of >> weeks now on and off. I have been trying to set up a connection >> outside my host linux box. I can get a connection which allows me to >> s

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-13 Thread Joel Kreager
Christopher Marshall wrote: > Joel: > > I am curious what would happen if you tried one of the simpler setups not > involving NAT. > > Say you have two physical hosts, A, and B, and one UML instance, C, running > on B. Let A and B be > connected to the same ethernet and let there be two /24 ne

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-13 Thread Rodrigo Baroni
Hi Joel, On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: > I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of > weeks now on and off. I've described the steps made to get a fully uml virtual machine at: http://www.ime.usp.br/~baroni/docs/uml-en.html Take a l

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-13 Thread Christopher Marshall
Joel: I am curious what would happen if you tried one of the simpler setups not involving NAT. Say you have two physical hosts, A, and B, and one UML instance, C, running on B. Let A and B be connected to the same ethernet and let there be two /24 nets (10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24) be involve

Re: [uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-12 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote: > I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of > weeks now on and off. I have been trying to set up a connection > outside my host linux box. I can get a connection which allows me to > ssh into the uml from th

[uml-user] Can't get connected to net from UML

2007-04-12 Thread Joel Kreager
I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of weeks now on and off. I have been trying to set up a connection outside my host linux box. I can get a connection which allows me to ssh into the uml from the host or the host from the uml, but every setup I have tried seems to