Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-30 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 29 April 2006 20:36, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > You're consistently typing udb2 instead of ubd2 (note the exchange of > > letters). That's your error, unless it's only in the mail. > > You're right. I made that error, althou

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:45:59PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:55:28PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > > VFS: Cannot open root device "udb2" or unknown-block(0,0) > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option > > Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Herm... than it's a problem with debian's binary: it has isofs as > modules and didn't build initrd support. I'm testing the new package > right now, I'll upload it by tomorrow. Thanks for looking into this. FWIW, I just filed a De

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:36:58AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: [...] > > There's no problem with the ISO, assuming you've compiled in iso9660. > > This may be a problem with the Debian binary. See my reply to Jeff in a > moment. Her

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:45:59PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > Looks like you don't have CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD enabled. > If you didn't start with a defconfig when you built UML, you should > start over with a defconfig. I'm running user-mode-linux_2.6.16-1um-1_i386 from the Debian Etch archive. If i

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > You're consistently typing udb2 instead of ubd2 (note the exchange of > letters). That's your error, unless it's only in the mail. You're right. I made that error, although the UML kernel is supposed to catch that and transpose. But

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Pascal Bourguignon
Blaisorblade writes: > On Friday 28 April 2006 23:55, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > > I have several empty filesystems, and a Debian bootable ISO. I'm trying > > the following: > > > linux ubd0=root-9629.img ubd1=swap-9629.img \ > > ubd2r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso root=/dev/udb2 > > You'r

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-29 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 28 April 2006 23:55, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > I have several empty filesystems, and a Debian bootable ISO. I'm trying > the following: > linux ubd0=root-9629.img ubd1=swap-9629.img \ > ubd2r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso root=/dev/udb2 You're consistently typing udb2 instead of

Re: [uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:55:28PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > VFS: Cannot open root device "udb2" or unknown-block(0,0) > Please append a correct "root=" boot option > Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on > unknown-block(0,0) Looks like you don't have CONFIG

[uml-user] Problems booting from ISO

2006-04-28 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
I have several empty filesystems, and a Debian bootable ISO. I'm trying the following: linux ubd0=root-9629.img ubd1=swap-9629.img \ ubd2r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso root=/dev/udb2 and getting errors: Initializing software serial port version 1 ubda: unknown partition table