Alle 20:58, venerdì, 14. luglio 2006, hai scritto:
> That kernel came from my development tree, which had the TLS patches
> in it. However, I don't fiddle the kernel version to reflect that.
> So, that kernel claimed to be 2.6.16, even though it was really 2.6.16
> + TLS patches + a bunch of other
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Alle 21:23, gioved?, 13. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> > The combination boots fine here - I wouldn't have put them up otherwise.
>
> But now I'm confused - one other mail stated to use 2.6.17 because versions
> before this
On Friday 14 July 2006 19:20, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Alle 21:23, giovedì, 13. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> > The combination boots fine here - I wouldn't have put them up otherwise.
>
> But now I'm confused - one other mail stated to use 2.6.17 because versions
> before this weren't TLS-aw
Alle 21:23, giovedì, 13. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> The combination boots fine here - I wouldn't have put them up otherwise.
But now I'm confused - one other mail stated to use 2.6.17 because versions
before this weren't TLS-aware.
> What's your host?
It's still the same stock Debian
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:14:17PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> The uml_net helper tool was indeed in /usr/lib/uml, and moving it fixed the
> hang. Isn't there a better error indiciation than just hanging in the case of
> the utility not being present?
Yes, there is. This was a stupid bug, wil
Alle 21:21, mercoledì, 12. luglio 2006, hai scritto:
> Vanilla 2.6.16 kernel don't have TLS support, only ones with -bs. Upgrade
> to 2.6.17.
I've got a working system already.
This doesn't change the problem that the kernel + image combination on the
webpage doesn't work out of the box. The kern
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 16:59, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alle 03:22, venerdì, 7. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> [NPTL errors on stock download kernel+image]
>
> > The kernel linked there has NPTL support. What exactly were the errors?
>
> """
> cannot set up thread-local storage: set
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 20:24, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> remove_umid_dir - actually_do_remove failed with err = -2
> BUG: warning
> at /home/jdike/linux/2.6/linux-2.6.16/kernel/irq/manage.c:274/free_irq()
> 08962c2c: [<0805857c>
Alle 22:16, mercoledì, 5. luglio 2006, hai scritto:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:24:42PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > after finding a combination of kernel and root fs which don't throw
> > NPTL-related errors on me (like the ones linked on the "new" webpages
> > do), working ins
Hi,
Alle 03:22, venerdì, 7. luglio 2006, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
[NPTL errors on stock download kernel+image]
> The kernel linked there has NPTL support. What exactly were the errors?
"""
cannot set up thread-local storage: set_thread_area failed when setting up
thread-local storage
Kernel panic
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:24:42PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after finding a combination of kernel and root fs which don't throw
> NPTL-related errors on me (like the ones linked on the "new" webpages do),
The kernel linked there has NPTL support. What exactly were the errors?
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:24:42PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after finding a combination of kernel and root fs which don't throw
> NPTL-related errors on me (like the ones linked on the "new" webpages do),
> working inside UML is all fine but I cannot get the eth0 interface up.
>
Hello,
after finding a combination of kernel and root fs which don't throw
NPTL-related errors on me (like the ones linked on the "new" webpages do),
working inside UML is all fine but I cannot get the eth0 interface up.
This is on a standard Debian/sarge host system (kernel 2.4.27 without any
13 matches
Mail list logo
