Re: [uml-user] x86_64 and UML

2008-02-01 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:00:29PM -0500, lanas wrote: > > Yes, modulo a couple of host bugs which have been fixed. > > OK, I then rush to get the latest UML kernel ? ;-) *host* bugs - you need to rush to get the latest host kernel... Jeff -- Work email - jdike

Re: [uml-user] x86_64 and UML

2008-01-31 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:04:26PM -0500, lanas wrote: > So, since UML is a user process, shoudn't it be that it can run on a > 64-bit AMD machine as is, along with a 32-bit filesystem ? Yes, modulo a couple of host bugs which have been fixed. Jeff -- Work emai

[uml-user] x86_64 and UML

2008-01-31 Thread lanas
Hi, There's a thing (at least one...) that I don't get. An AMD x86_64 is able to run 32-bits user processes. In fact, I got from the Fedora yum a 32-bit version of Firefox alongside the 64-bit version. So, since UML is a user process, shoudn't it be that it can run on a 64-bit AMD machine a