Re: [uml-user] Cannot find a stable version

2011-06-25 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Gordon Russell wrote: > I have never tried a bisect, but the online guides seem clear enough, > except they seem to require a starting point which is a good kernel > version. Which version has Commit 482db6? The changelogs have commits > which have numbers much muc

Re: [uml-user] Cannot find a stable version

2011-06-24 Thread Gordon Russell
I rebuilt with 2.6.31.2, started from defconfig, added in a few of things I wanted, and no crash yet. Things maybe looking hopeful now! Thanks for the defconfig suggestion. I will add in a few more config things over the next few days but fingers crossed I will be fine. Thanks Gordon. > I will le

Re: [uml-user] Cannot find a stable version

2011-06-24 Thread Gordon Russell
I have never tried a bisect, but the online guides seem clear enough, except they seem to require a starting point which is a good kernel version. Which version has Commit 482db6? The changelogs have commits which have numbers much much longer than the commit id you gave (e.g 32 character hex numbe

Re: [uml-user] Cannot find a stable version

2011-06-24 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Gordon Russell wrote: > Hi All. > I have been using user mode linux since 2004, but I have decided to > update my images to fedora 15. > However I cannot get a stable uml kernel to run this image. > > For instance 2.6.39.1 crashes when I try "yum update". The erro