Re: [uml-user] UML networking setup

2012-02-06 Thread clownix
Hello, 172.20.113.137 for your uml would work, as it is in the same lan as your host, but you need to bridge your host's interface to the tap you have just created. Then if this worked, both your host and your uml would be able to access to your adsl router, BUT I have never been able to bridge (

Re: [uml-user] UML networking setup

2012-02-06 Thread Riccardo Murri
Hi, On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 19:22, Saket Chawla wrote: >  Can someone help me with setting up networking in UML? There are several different ways of making the UML guest communicate with the host, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The "old site" has a fairly comprehensive review of netw

Re: [uml-user] UML Networking setup

2010-04-26 Thread Simon Knight
Netkit (www.netkit.org) might be useful. It automates a lot of the process of setting up virtual links. It can handle the tuntap side of things quite well. I set it up so I can ssh to each of the virtual machines directly from my Linux machine, so there's no reason you shouldn't be able to get the

Re: [uml-user] UML Networking setup

2010-04-26 Thread Leo Prasath
I am setting up multiple UML machines to simulate multiple machines communicating through a router using "http://read.cs.ucla.edu/click/"; . So, I need separate virtual interfaces for each UML so that the router can see several machines. Actually, I figured out the problem of why my second UML mac

Re: [uml-user] UML Networking setup

2010-04-25 Thread Rahul Gauba
Hi!,     I think you can still work with a single tap device and keep it simple. I generally run 4-5 UML on a single host and all of them are reachable from other machines on the LAN. Assuming that my machine as a static IP 10.121.32.231, I run multiple UML instances as: ./linux-2.6.24-rc7 mem=