Hi,
>
> > > Since I need to keep the SuSE kernel for the host system
> for various
> > > reasons, would it solve the problem, if I include the commandline
> > > syemu patch in the guest kernel and start it with
> nosysemu parameter?
> > I'm almost sure an updated SuSE kernel would solve this.
> > Since I need to keep the SuSE kernel for the host system for various
> > reasons, would it solve the problem, if I include the commandline syemu
> > patch in the guest kernel and start it with nosysemu parameter?
> I'm almost sure an updated SuSE kernel would solve this.
There are some uml upd
On Friday 08 April 2005 20:35, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > Going by memory, this was because earlier SYSEMU patches were
> > buggy. Recent UML refuse to run on earlier buggy SKAS patch
> > revision. Older ones seemed to run well, but crashed due to
> > the SYSEMU bug, for instance, when you did echo
> Going by memory, this was because earlier SYSEMU patches were
> buggy. Recent UML refuse to run on earlier buggy SKAS patch
> revision. Older ones seemed to run well, but crashed due to
> the SYSEMU bug, for instance, when you did echo 0 >
> /proc/sysemu, and strace didn't work well, and so
On Friday 08 April 2005 11:20, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have running UML with a 2.4.27 kernel for sometime on SUSE 9.1 with
> kernel 2.6.5-7.111-default without any problems.
>
> After upgrading to SUSE 9.2 (kernel 2.6.8-24.14-default) UML crahs on start
> up (see below). If I boot again w
