Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6 vs kernel 2.4

2005-10-19 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:28, Fabio wrote: > Hi! > in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not > kernel um to download. > What's wrong? this isn't your homepage? Yes, that's my homepage, and I ship patches indeed. I don't ship binary kernels at the moment, sor

Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6 vs kernel 2.4

2005-10-19 Thread Nelson Castillo
On 10/19/05, Fabio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not > kernel um to download. > > What's wrong? this isn't your homepage? It is. You'll have to compile your kernel. -- Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco The first pr

Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6 vs kernel 2.4

2005-10-19 Thread Fabio
Hi! in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not kernel um to download. What's wrong? this isn't your homepage? Fabio On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:03, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:40, Fabio wrote: > > Hi! > > I've another question: can I

Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6 vs kernel 2.4

2005-10-19 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:40, Fabio wrote: > Hi! > I've another question: can I use a kernel 2.4 (for um) on a kernel 2.6 > (host)? Yes, it's possible. But it must be a recent kernel. If you use 2.4.28-bs2 (from my homepage), it works. If you use 2.4.24-1um, it doesn't. The fix was merged i