I dont really know how many people would be interested, but I have set
up a cluster
of free-access user-mode-linux machines. To use one, you currently
need to go through a
bit of user account registration (select Just Interested as your programme).
Once done, you press a button to queue for the nex
Hi
I was bring up uml with the smp support. I enabled smp option in the config
file through make menuconfig ARCH=um. I build the linux image. I used the
root_fs_toms1.7.205. I could boot, but could not log into the console. I
get the error as
CPU#0 received unknown IPI [X]! when ever I type some
Hi
I've just begun about 3 weeks ago to delve into UML. After the (usual)
hard and steep learning curve, I'm now quite satisfied with the setup,
except for one thing I just can't explain: sshd seems to refuse
connections from outside.
My setup:
· host and umls: debian sarge
· host runs kernel-
Check your /var/log/secure file and /var/log/messages file or where ever you
keep your particular logs. See if you get some sort of can't attach to
/dev/ptms error.
If so there is your problem, you have a devfs issue.
My fix was to recompile with out /dev/fs (the default), insure that linux 98
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 02:12, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> Sorry if this is an old topic, I'm a potential new UML user and I don't
> see it mentioned on the web page.
>
> Should I expect a 2.4 based UML to run properly when hosted by a 2.6
> host system? Is this a common configuration?
Yes, I'd
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 07:49, Shavian Shakes wrote:
> Hi again, the uml kernel I compiled seems to be running fine except
> that the config name and config release are missing from the output of
> "uname -r ". eg:
>
> # uname -r
> 2.6.5-0-
>
> # uname -a
> Linux um4_lnx21 2.6.5-0- #1 Mon Apr 18
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 17:26, Dominik Wezel wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just begun about 3 weeks ago to delve into UML. After the (usual)
> hard and steep learning curve, I'm now quite satisfied with the setup,
> except for one thing I just can't explain: sshd seems to refuse
> connections from outsi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 11:45, Suresh wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was bring up uml with the smp support. I enabled smp option in the config
> file through make menuconfig ARCH=um. I build the linux image. I used the
> root_fs_toms1.7.205.
> I could boot, but could not log into the console. I
> get the e
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 11:26, Gordon Russell wrote:
> I dont really know how many people would be interested, but I have set
> up a cluster
> of free-access user-mode-linux machines. To use one, you currently
> need to go through a
> bit of user account registration (select Just Interested as y
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:57, Yu Dong-W4760C wrote:
> when i use kill -USR1 after UML launch, a gdb xterm is prompt
> up and pirnt message as: GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.1post-1.20040607.52rh)
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Publ
Hi,
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 02:12, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> > Sorry if this is an old topic, I'm a potential new UML user and I
> > don't see it mentioned on the web page.
> >
> > Should I expect a 2.4 based UML to run properly when hosted
> by a 2.6
> > host system? Is this a common co
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [uml-user] failure notice
Scanning time = 21-4-2005 2:23:27
Engine/Pattern = 7.510-1002/2.590.00
Action on virus found:
The message body contains WORM_N
12 matches
Mail list logo
