On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:06PM -0500, Allen Chan wrote:
The problem can be reproduced by repeatedly
> executing the following command inside the UML guest:
> tcsh -c 'echo `hostname`'
Nice test case! This appears to be a skas0 bug - the skas0 segfault handler
is segfaulting for some re
On Thursday 02 February 2006 11:23, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:06PM -0500, Allen Chan wrote:
>> The problem can be reproduced by repeatedly
> > executing the following command inside the UML guest:
> > tcsh -c 'echo `hostname`'
>
> Nice test case! This appears to be a ska
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:01:26PM -0500, Allen Chan wrote:
> This issue may not be limited to skas0, as I'm encountering these
> symptoms while using skas3 patched hosts, both on my own machines and
> on a UML guest hosted at linode.com.
I'm also seeing this on skas3.
---
> -Original Message-
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:27:42PM +0100, Robert Hillen wrote:
> > Thanks Jeff. Your patch seems to fix the problem partly,
> but I still
> > get the "device busy" error because the tun device still remains
> > attached to one process after eth0 is disabled in the
Hi UML'ers,
OK, I'm kinda newbie on this, and maybe I am expecting something wrong but here is my situation:
I have a UML built on linux-2.4.28 which is running fine. I can
set up several of these UMLs and network them together using uml_switch
and that works fine, normally. But I want to do so
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:26:18PM -0800, frank evans wrote:
> 1) Am I crazy, or does the UML just not want to do multicast?
UML doesn't care about multicast. I'd bet there's a missing route or
something.
> 2) Am I looking in all the right places in the uml_switch to watch the
> data, or did I
