--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What was the boot output?
Verbatim terminal output
$ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 mem=64M
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:45:33PM +0200, Jax wrote:
> > > $ ARCH=um make linux
> > >
> > make linux ARCH=um
>
> These should be the same. In one case, it's in the environment and in the
> other, it's on the command line, but it's all the same to th
On Sunday 06 August 2006 12:41, Richard Andrews wrote:
> --- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What was the boot output?
>
> Verbatim terminal output
>
> $ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 mem=64M
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
> Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...O
On Sunday 06 August 2006 12:58, Richard Andrews wrote:
> --- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:45:33PM +0200, Jax wrote:
> > > > $ ARCH=um make linux
> > >
> > > make linux ARCH=um
> >
> > These should be the same. In one case, it's in the environment and in
> > t
On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:26, Etay Meiri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I applied skas-2.6.17-rc5-v9-pre9.patch to kernel 2.6.17 and tried
> to build it for Athlon/Duron/K7 architecture. The build failed
> with the error below. I changed the architecture to P3 and the build
> passed correctly.
This is a UML
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 08:41:20PM +1000, Richard Andrews wrote:
> UML running in SKAS0 mode
> Adding 31916032 bytes to physical memory to account for exec-shield gap
> remove_umid_dir - actually_do_remove failed with err = -2
>
> The "remove_umid_dir line" is a ruse. The error seems to be generat
Hi,
I've noticed a strange time related issue with a new UML guest image
I've created (Based on Ubuntu Dapper).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.cpan/build/Compress-Zlib-1.42# touch Makefile && date &&
stat Makefile
Sun Aug 6 19:42:09 BST 2006
File: `Makefile'
Size: 25782 Blocks: 64
Not sure I understand this - what else should I use for an updated
UML build? (vanilla kernel?)
Thanks,
Etay
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 16:54 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:26, Etay Meiri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I applied skas-2.6.17-rc5-v9-pre9.patch to kernel 2.6.17 and t
I'm looking for advice on building up a filesystem image file.
I have a working server that I want to mimick in UML. What is the best way to
get the filesystem of the real server into a UML filesystem image? What are the
gotchas? eg. I can immediately suspect device configs and partition tables
w
