[uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-07 Thread K D
Hi Am newbie to UML. I have 2.6.24 kernel, which I've built from source. I've also built UML from 2.6.24 in different directory. I could load UML from my host OS and mount hostfs without any issue. This is how I built UML from source, 1. untar linux source 2. make defconfig ARCH=um 3. make me

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-09 Thread K D
ls.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 769 Jan 24 14:58 tls.h [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.24]# What am I missing? thanks - Original Message From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: K D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 8:4

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-09 Thread K D
ENTATION=y CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED=y CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK=y CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING=y === end of config ==

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-10 Thread K D
Hi Can someone give me their UML config file for 2.6.24 or above kernel? I hope to compile my module for kernel that is built with this config. thanks - Original Message From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: K D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: user-mod

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-13 Thread K D
ke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: K D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:42:43 AM Subject: Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:29:39PM -0700, K D wrote: > When I compile my module with UML

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-20 Thread K D
*** [/home/kdev/mods/hello.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/home/kdev/mods] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kdev/uml/linux-2.6.25' make: *** [all] Error 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/mods$ - Original Message From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: K D <[EMAIL

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-05-21 Thread K D
my uml setup is up and running..will develop my networking related module on UML. - Original Message From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: K D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:20:16 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-12-25 Thread K D
Link (http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/FedoraCore5/FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs.bz2) to download FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs seems to be broken. Can someone post a working link pl? thanks From: Jeff Dike To: K D Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent

Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML

2008-12-28 Thread K D
Thanks for your reply. Thats what I ended up downloading and its working. However, it would be good if someone can put instructions to make a minimal root_fs that is specific to the distro that he/she is using. From: Unknown To: K D Cc: Jeff Dike ; user

[uml-user] loopback/networking not working

2008-12-29 Thread K D
estination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface [r...@localhost adp]# ifconfig [r...@localhost adp]# From: Unknown To: K D Cc: Jeff Dike ; user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 12:11:59 AM S

[uml-user] pl ignore my last email about loopback/networking

2008-12-29 Thread K D
just had to do 'ifconfig lo ..up'. sorry From: Unknown To: K D Cc: Jeff Dike ; user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 12:11:59 AM Subject: Re: [uml-user] do i have to recompile my module in UML Hello, You

[uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread K D
nknown-block(98,0) thanks From: Flavio To: K D Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 2:34:00 AM Subject: Re: [uml-user] link broken: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/FedoraCore5/FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs.bz2 2008/12/26 K D

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread K D
d 0f85bf10: [<0804991d>] mount_block_root+0x107/0x11b 0f85bf64: [<08049982>] mount_root+0x51/0x56 0f85bf78: [<08049aac>] prepare_namespace+0x125/0x149 0f85bf80: [<08049629>] kernel_init+0x83/0x8c 0f85bf98: [<08064d72>] run_kernel_thread+0x38/0x42 0f85bfcc: [<080576

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-14 Thread K D
ful. thanks Prasad From: Unknown To: K D Cc: David Moffatt ; user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:26:02 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0 Hello, It seems that you are using the root_fs from