Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-03 Thread Sijie Guo
> ledger: Dump ledger index entries into readable format. > usage: ledger [-m] > > > -- > *From:* Belgundi, Prajakta > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:03 PM > *To:* user@bookkeeper.apache.org > *Cc:* Enrico Olivelli ; Flavio Junqueira < > f...@apache.org&g

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-03 Thread Sharda, Ravi
ormat. usage: ledger [-m] From: Belgundi, Prajakta Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:03 PM To: user@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: Enrico Olivelli ; Flavio Junqueira ; Sharda, Ravi Subject: RE: Bookeeper exception on pods restart Sorry to digress a litt

RE: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-03 Thread Prajakta.Belgundi
we don’t lose/corrupt any data? -Thanks, Prajakta From: Sijie Guo Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 1:53 PM To: Sharda, Ravi Cc: Belgundi, Prajakta; Enrico Olivelli; user; Flavio Junqueira Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] I mean the error "ERROR: invalid ledg

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-03 Thread Sijie Guo
elli ; user < > user@bookkeeper.apache.org>; Flavio Junqueira > *Subject:* Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > I think 4.7.2 is using UUID as the ledger id formatter by default (it was > a mistake, and reverted in its subsequent releases). >

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-03 Thread Sharda, Ravi
lavio Junqueira Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] I think 4.7.2 is using UUID as the ledger id formatter by default (it was a mistake, and reverted in its subsequent releases). So you might have to run “bin/bookkeeper shell ledger -ledgeridformat long -m [ledg

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-02 Thread Sijie Guo
> -- > *From:* Enrico Olivelli > *Sent:* Monday, December 2, 2019 7:01 PM > *To:* user > *Cc:* Sijie Guo ; Flavio Junqueira > *Subject:* Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > > sh-4.2# ./bookkeeper shell ledge

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-02 Thread Sharda, Ravi
ledger 728 From: Enrico Olivelli Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 7:01 PM To: user Cc: Sijie Guo ; Flavio Junqueira Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] sh-4.2# ./bookkeeper shell ledger -m 56 ERROR: invalid ledger id 56 ledger: Dump

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
t; usage: ledger [-m] > -m,--meta Print meta information > -- > *From:* Sijie Guo > *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2019 3:15 PM > *To:* Sharda, Ravi > *Cc:* user ; Flavio Junqueira > *Subject:* Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] >

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-12-02 Thread Sharda, Ravi
Hello Sijie, Any luck with this? Please let us know what could be going wrong. Thanks & best regards, Ravi From: Sharda, Ravi Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 3:28 PM To: Sijie Guo Cc: user ; Flavio Junqueira Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods res

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-29 Thread Sijie Guo
that the log file exists. Attaching the output > of "ls -R -L", instead. > > ------ > *From:* Sijie Guo > *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2019 2:31 PM > *To:* Sharda, Ravi > *Cc:* user ; Flavio Junqueira > *Subject:* Re: Bookeeper e

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-29 Thread Sijie Guo
hat we are seeing now. > > Thanks & best regards, > Ravi > -- > *From:* Sijie Guo > *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2019 2:10 PM > *To:* user > *Cc:* Flavio Junqueira ; Sharda, Ravi < > ravi.sha...@dell.com> > *Subject:* Re:

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-29 Thread Sijie Guo
at 12:11 AM wrote: > + Ravi, who will be looking into this …. > > > > *From:* Enrico Olivelli - Diennea > *Sent:* Thursday, November 28, 2019 7:00 PM > *To:* user@bookkeeper.apache.org > *Cc:* f...@apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart > &

RE: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-29 Thread Prajakta.Belgundi
+ Ravi, who will be looking into this …. From: Enrico Olivelli - Diennea Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 7:00 PM To: user@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: f...@apache.org Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] From the error it looks like one client is trying to read an

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli - Diennea
resolve itself when auto-replication runs?? -Thanks, Prajakta From: Enrico Olivelli - Diennea Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 6:11 PM To: user@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: f...@apache.org Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] I don’t think there is a good value. Yo

RE: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-28 Thread Prajakta.Belgundi
@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: f...@apache.org Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] I don’t think there is a good value. You can use WriteQuorumSize = AckQuorumSize, this way you will see an error on the writing client in case of write failure to any of the bookies Usually you are enabling

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli - Diennea
ecommend, so we never see this? What other ledger creation parameters do you need information about? -Thanks, Prajakta From: Enrico Olivelli - Diennea Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 5:19 PM To: user@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc: f...@apache.org Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

RE: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-28 Thread Prajakta.Belgundi
...@apache.org Subject: Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Hi Prajakta, What ledger creation parameters are you using ? Ensamble size, Write quorum size, Ack quorum size ? If ackQuorumSize < WriteQuorumSize it is possible that a write to the bookie failed and even if

Re: Bookeeper exception on pods restart

2019-11-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli - Diennea
Hi Prajakta, What ledger creation parameters are you using ? Ensamble size, Write quorum size, Ack quorum size ? If ackQuorumSize < WriteQuorumSize it is possible that a write to the bookie failed and even if the entry is supposed to be on the bookie it never reached it but the overall single w