lse
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> }'};
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
DRA-11513
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11513> locally on 3.5,
> possible duplicate.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Joel Knighton <
> joel.knigh...@datastax.com> wrote:
>
>> There's some precedent for similar issues with static columns
gt;
> cqlsh:ks> select pk,a from test0 where pk=0 and a=2;
>
> pk | a
> +---
> 0 | 1
> 0 | 2
> 0 | 3
>
> We can verify this claim by applying 11513 Patch to 3.5 Tag and build &
> test for 12003. If it is fixed then we can guarantee the claim. Let me
> k
syntax?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Oleg
>
>
--
<http://www.datastax.com/>
Joel Knighton
Cassandra Developer | joel.knigh...@datastax.com
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/datastax>
<https://www.facebook.com/datastax> <https://twitter.com/datastax>
<https://
is now DOWN
>
> INFO [GossipStage:83] 2016-04-07 16:38:07,861 StorageService.java:1914 -
> Removing tokens[*BLAH*] for /10.1.200.14
>
>
>
> Thanks !
>
--
<http://www.datastax.com/>
Joel Knighton
Cassandra Developer | joel.knigh...@datastax.com
<https://www.lin
any sense. Obviously, it IS supported because it works
> most of the time. Is this just a result of not enough replicas, and the
> error message is jacked up?
>
> I’m running 2.1.13.
>
> Thanks
>
> Robert
>
>
--
<http://www.datastax.com/>
Joel Knighton
Cassandra
Then I run a
> repair. Will repair move the token ranges from down node to other node ? In
> other words in any situation, does repair operation *ever* change token
> ownership ?
>
>
>
> Thanks !
>
--
<http://www.datastax.com/>
Joel Knighton
Cassandra Developer | jo
<cong.zh...@fmr.com> wrote:
> The version I’m running is datastax-ddc-3.3.0. It seems not an affected
> version…
>
>
>
> *From:* Joel Knighton [mailto:joel.knigh...@datastax.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:31 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:*
8075193, 8708181464490295602, 8719281186367503476,
> 8743407730212179670, 8782996992749946235, 8848834787326682329,
> 8913871967919712952, 9044250345847868181, 9184734792478964742,
> 955142821741666815, 998590089428154995] for /10.240.131.52
>
>
>
> 10.240.131.52 is the node
> wasn't aware of it earlier.
>
> Will a node in hibernating state that failed joining and subsequently was
> discarded get removed from gossip at some point?
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Joel Knighton <joel.knigh...@datastax.com
> > wrote:
>
>&g
1. A hibernating node is participating in gossip but intentionally hasn't
yet joined the ring. The two cases where a node would set a hibernating
status are when the node was started with "-Dcassandra.join_ring=False" and
has tokens or when the node was started to replace another node (using
11 matches
Mail list logo
