settings 2.1.16 performs better and all
>>> levels was properly aligned.
>>> ------
>>> *From:* Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:20:19 PM
>>> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
>&g
uot; impl removed and if you have a
>>> requirement for this,its not available.If you don't have the requirement
>>> 3.0.9 can be tried out. 3.9 version we did some testing and find lot issues
>>> in compaction,hint corruption etc.
>>>
>>> Regar
@jaumo.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:20:19 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
>
> What are the compaction issues / hint corruprions you encountered? Are
> there JIRA tickets for it?
>
enjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:20:19 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
What are the compaction issues / hint corruprions you encountered? Are there
JIRA tickets for it?
I am curios cause I use
roduction since some months, BUT
>>>>> (it's a quite big one) maintainance is a pain. Bootstrapping and repairs
>>>>> may be - depending on the model, config, amount of data - really, really
>>>>> painful. I'm currently investigating intensively.
>>>>>
>&g
abs.com>
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> 3.0 has "off the heap memtable" impl removed and if you have a
>>>>> requirement for this,its not available.If you don't have the requirement
>>>>> 3.0.9 can be tried out. 3.9 version we did some tes
heap memtable" impl removed and if you have a
>>>> requirement for this,its not available.If you don't have the requirement
>>>> 3.0.9 can be tried out. 3.9 version we did some testing and find lot issues
>>>> in compaction,hint corruption etc.
>>>>
&
t; *Subject:* Re: Which version is stable enough for production
>>> environment?
>>>
>>> Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Original --
>>> *From: * "Harikrishnan Pillai"
don't have the requirement
>> 3.0.9 can be tried out. 3.9 version we did some testing and find lot issues
>> in compaction,hint corruption etc.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Hari
>>
>>
>> --------------
>> *From:* Discovery <w
*From:* Discovery <wl_...@qq.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:59 PM
> *To:* user
> *Subject:* Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
>
> Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
>
>
> -- Original --
ption etc.
Regards
Hari
From: Discovery <wl_...@qq.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:59 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
-- Original ---
ards
Hari
From: Discovery <wl_...@qq.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:59 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
-- Original --
From: "Harik
Some of us want to start as a probe of concept and would like to know --> Why
version 3.x is not recommended?
From: Long [mailto:on.long...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 November 2016 02:17
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
You should
r production environment?
Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
-- Original --From: "Harikrishnan
Pillai";<hpil...@walmartlabs.com>;Date: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 09:57 AMTo:
"user"<user@cassandra.apache.org>; Subject: Re: Wh
Why version 3.x is not recommended? Thanks.
-- Original --
From: "Harikrishnan Pillai";<hpil...@walmartlabs.com>;
Date: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 09:57 AM
To: "user"<user@cassandra.apache.org>;
Subject: Re: Which version
Cassandra 2.1.16
From: Discovery
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:42 PM
To: user
Subject: Which version is stable enough for production environment?
Hi Cassandra Experts,
We prepare to deploy Cassandra in production env, but
16 matches
Mail list logo