Re: upgrade 2.1 to 3.0

2018-08-21 Thread kooljava2
We found the solution for our High read volume bytes with help of DSE, we made 
following change

$ lvchange -r 16 

Following parameter in cassandra.yaml:- 
disk_access_mode: mmap_index_only

 Thank you.

On Monday, 13 August 2018, 10:39:28 GMT-7, kooljava2  
wrote:  
 
  We did run "nodetool upgradesstables" on all nodes. The C* version is 3.0.15
Thank you. 

   On Saturday, 11 August 2018, 21:47:52 GMT-7, Elliott Sims 
 wrote:  
 
 Might be a silly question, but did you run "nodetool upgradesstables" and 
convert to the 3.0 format?  Also, which 3.0?  Newest, or an earlier 3.0.x?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:05 PM, kooljava2  wrote:

Hello,
We recently upgrade C* from 2.1 to 3.0. After the upgrade we are seeing 
increase in the  total read bytes and read ops on the EBS volumes. It almost 
doubled on all the nodes.  The number of writes are same. 


Thank you. 




Re: upgrade 2.1 to 3.0

2018-08-13 Thread kooljava2
 We did run "nodetool upgradesstables" on all nodes. The C* version is 3.0.15
Thank you. 

   On Saturday, 11 August 2018, 21:47:52 GMT-7, Elliott Sims 
 wrote:  
 
 Might be a silly question, but did you run "nodetool upgradesstables" and 
convert to the 3.0 format?  Also, which 3.0?  Newest, or an earlier 3.0.x?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:05 PM, kooljava2  wrote:

Hello,
We recently upgrade C* from 2.1 to 3.0. After the upgrade we are seeing 
increase in the  total read bytes and read ops on the EBS volumes. It almost 
doubled on all the nodes.  The number of writes are same. 


Thank you. 


  

Re: upgrade 2.1 to 3.0

2018-08-11 Thread Elliott Sims
Might be a silly question, but did you run "nodetool upgradesstables" and
convert to the 3.0 format?  Also, which 3.0?  Newest, or an earlier 3.0.x?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:05 PM, kooljava2 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We recently upgrade C* from 2.1 to 3.0. After the upgrade we are seeing
> increase in the  total read bytes and read ops on the EBS volumes. It
> almost doubled on all the nodes.  The number of writes are same.
>
>
> Thank you.
>