Thanks Andrus. Fortunately, even with Bitronix, we created a custom
SpringDataSourceFactor for Cayenne that allows Cayenne to participate in a
Spring managed transaction. It looks like that will service me as well for
Atomikos, since Spring is handling the transaction, not Cayenne. I'll let
you
Hi Frank,
As you see, with a few exceptions, Cayenne community just delegates
transactions to Cayenne and rarely cares about external tx manager. At the same
time we are quietly improving public transaction API in Cayenne, and I am
interested to see how that works Atomikos and other tx
Currently we have Bitronix. However, Bitronix hasn't been updated in years
and is dead as a project. We need transaction management because we write
to both a database and a JMS queue (ActiveMQ). We have existing custom code
to allow Cayenne to participate in a Spring managed transaction. I was
On 20/09/2016 11:30pm, Frank Herrmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has had any experience using a transaction
> manager with Cayenne. Currently, we use Bitronix with a lot of custom,
> buggy, code wrapped around it. We are in the process of switching to
> Atomikos. Does