Re: One query just for curiosity

2024-03-29 Thread gongzhongqiang
stream/operators/asyncio/ >> >> Best, >> Zhanghao Chen >> -- >> *From:* Ganesh Walse >> *Sent:* Friday, March 29, 2024 4:48 >> *To:* user@flink.apache.org >> *Subject:* One query just for curiosity >> >> Hi Team, >> If my 1

Re: One query just for curiosity

2024-03-28 Thread Zhanghao Chen
, Zhanghao Chen From: Ganesh Walse Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 10:42 To: Zhanghao Chen Cc: user@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: One query just for curiosity You mean to say we can process 32767 records in parallel. And may I know if this is the case then do we

Re: One query just for curiosity

2024-03-28 Thread Ganesh Walse
ay, March 29, 2024 4:48 > *To:* user@flink.apache.org > *Subject:* One query just for curiosity > > Hi Team, > If my 1 record gets processed in 1 second in a flink. Then what will be > the best time taken to process 1000 records in flink using maximum > parallelism. >

Re: One query just for curiosity

2024-03-28 Thread Zhanghao Chen
From: Ganesh Walse Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 4:48 To: user@flink.apache.org Subject: One query just for curiosity Hi Team, If my 1 record gets processed in 1 second in a flink. Then what will be the best time taken to process 1000 records in flink using maximum parallelism.

One query just for curiosity

2024-03-28 Thread Ganesh Walse
Hi Team, If my 1 record gets processed in 1 second in a flink. Then what will be the best time taken to process 1000 records in flink using maximum parallelism.