> We also discovered that the queuesize is
> global (across general/replication/priority queues) and if it reaches the
> 1GB limit, calls to all queues will drop. That was interesting because
even
> though the replication handlers have a different queue, the size is
> counted globally, affecting o
Yes, PHOENIX-1718 has about the same information
On Dec 1, 2016 1:12 AM, "Ted Yu" wrote:
> w.r.t. "Unable to find cached index metadata" error, have you seen this ?
>
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/Phoenix/9UY0h2YBSOhgbflB1?
> subj=Re+Global+Secondary+Index+ERROR+2008+INT10+Unable+
> to+find+cache
w.r.t. "Unable to find cached index metadata" error, have you seen this ?
http://search-hadoop.com/m/Phoenix/9UY0h2YBSOhgbflB1?subj=Re+Global+Secondary+Index+ERROR+2008+INT10+Unable+to+find+cached+index+metadata+PHOENIX+1718+
Cheers
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:59 PM, Neelesh
wrote:
Ted,
we use HDP 2.3.4 (HBase 1.1.2, phoenix 4.4 - but with a lot of backports
from later versions)
The key of the data table is
The two global indexes are and
Around 100B rows in the main table. The main issues we see are
# Sudden spikes in queueSize - going all the way to 1G limit and stay
Neelesh:Can you share more details about the sluggish cluster performance (such
as version of hbase / phoenix, your schema, region server log snippet, stack
traces, etc) ?
As hbase / phoenix evolve, I hope the performance keeps getting better for your
use case.
Cheers
On Wednesday, Novembe
ig Data to enterprises, and not just a Big Table implementation.
Not sure how integrated Cassandra is into that entire eco-system.
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Neelesh [mailto:neele...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:08 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hbase on H
We use both, in different capacities. Cassandra is an x-DC archive store
with mostly batch writes and occasional key based reads. Hbase is for
real-time event ingestion. Our experience so far on hbase + phoenix is that
when it works, it is fast and scales like crazy. But if you ever hit a snag
arou
Mich, this is a wrong group for your question.
We are not Cassandra experts either and even if we are - we love HBase more
:)
-Vlad
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Mich Talebzadeh
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Used Hbase on HDFS reasonably well. Happy to to stick with it and more with
> Hive/Phoenix
